Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37674035›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Surgical site infection and antimicrobial prophylaxis prescribing profile, and its determinants among hospitalized patients in Northeast Ethiopia: a hospital based cross-sectional study.

Habtemariam Alekaw Habteweld, Mohammed Yimam, Abate Wondesen Tsige, Yehualashet Teshome Wondmkun, Bedilu Linger Endalifer, Kassahun Dires Ayenew

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Habtemariam Alekaw HabteweldDepartment of Pharmacy, Debre Berhan University, P.O. Box 445, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia. habtsh6128alekaw@gmail.com.
Mohammed YimamDepartment of Pharmacy, Debre Berhan University, P.O. Box 445, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Abate Wondesen TsigeDepartment of Pharmacy, Debre Berhan University, P.O. Box 445, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Yehualashet Teshome WondmkunDepartment of Pharmacy, Debre Berhan University, P.O. Box 445, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Bedilu Linger EndaliferDepartment of Pharmacy, Debre Berhan University, P.O. Box 445, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Kassahun Dires AyenewDepartment of Pharmacy, Debre Berhan University, P.O. Box 445, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Debre Berhan University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inappropriate use of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis is a common cause for increased risk of morbidity and mortality from surgical site infection in patients who underwent surgical procedures. The study aimed to evaluate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis prescribing patterns, Surgical Site Infection (SSI), and its determinants in the surgical ward of Debre Berhan Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, northeast Ethiopia. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from October 1st 2022 to January 31st, 2023. Data collected from patient medical record cards and patient interviews were entered and analyzed using SPSS V26.0. The determinants of surgical site infection were determined from the multivariable logistic regression. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Ceftriaxone (70.5%) followed by a combination of ceftriaxone with metronidazole (21.90%) was the most frequently used prophylactic antibiotic. One hundred fifty-nine (78%) of patients were exposed to inappropriately used prophylactic antimicrobials and 62.2% of these were exposed to inappropriately selected antibiotics. One hundred twenty-six (61.9%) patients developed Surgical Site Infection (SSI). Duration of procedure longer than an hour and inappropriate use of antimicrobial prophylaxiswere the independent predictors for the occurrence of surgical site infections. Patients whose operation was lasted in longer than an hour were 3.39 times more likely to develop SSI compared to those whose operation was completed in less than an hour, AOR = 3.39 (95% CI: 1.24-9.30). Similarly, controlling the effect of other covariate variables, individuals who were given inappropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis were 6.67 times more likely to develop SSI compared to those given appropriate prophylaxis, AOR = 6.67 (95% CI: 1.05-42.49). The high rate of SSI requires due attention from clinicians as well as health policymakers. Duration of surgical procedure greater than an hour and inappropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis use was the independent predictor of surgical site infections.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsSurgical Wound InfectionCeftriaxoneCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaHospitalsHumansProspective StudiesAnti-Infective AgentsCeftriaxone

Identifiers

PMID37674035
PMCPMC10482873
OpenAlexW4386477452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.