Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37673861›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

The mutational landscape of the adult healthy parous and nulliparous human breast.

Biancastella Cereser, Angela Yiu, Neha Tabassum, Lisa Del Bel Belluz, Sladjana Zagorac, Kenneth Russell Zapanta Ancheta, Rongrong Zhong, Cristian Miere, Alicia Rose Jeffries-Jones, Nina Moderau and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Molecular Basis of Breast Tumor Heterogeneity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Biancastella CereserCancer Genetics Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. b.cereser@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1243-1767
Angela YiuCancer Genetics Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Neha TabassumCancer Genetics Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Lisa Del Bel BelluzCancer Genetics Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sladjana ZagoracCancer Genetics Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Kenneth Russell Zapanta AnchetaCancer Genetics Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rongrong ZhongCancer Genetics Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Cristian MiereCancer Genetics Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alicia Rose Jeffries-JonesCancer Genetics Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nina ModerauCancer Genetics Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Benjamin WernerEvolutionary Dynamics Group, Centre for Cancer Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6857-8699
Justin StebbingCancer Genetics Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. justin.stebbing@aru.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1117-6947
Imperial College London · GBLondon Cancer · GBMolecular Oncology (United States) · USQueen Mary University of London · GBRoyal Veterinary College · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accumulation of somatic mutations in healthy human tissues has been extensively characterized, but the mutational landscape of the healthy breast is still poorly understood. Our analysis of whole-genome sequencing shows that in line with other healthy organs, the healthy breast during the reproduction years accumulates mutations with age, with the rate of accumulation in the epithelium of 15.24 ± 5 mutations/year. Both epithelial and stromal compartments contain mutations in breast-specific driver genes, indicative of subsequent positive selection. Parity- and age-associated differences are evident in the mammary epithelium, partly explaining the observed difference in breast cancer risk amongst women of different childbearing age. Parity is associated with an age-dependent increase in the clone size of mutated epithelial cells, suggesting that older first-time mothers have a higher probability of accumulating oncogenic events in the epithelium compared to younger mothers or nulliparous women. In conclusion, we describe the reference genome of the healthy female human breast during reproductive years and provide evidence of how parity affects the genomic landscape of the mammary gland.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsAdultEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansMutationParityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37673861
PMCPMC10482899
OpenAlexW4386482545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.