Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37673679›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2024

Iatrogenic air embolism: influence of air bubble size on cerebral infarctions in an experimental in vivo and numerical simulation model.

Tabea C Schaefer, Svenja Greive, Claas Bierwisch, Shoya Mohseni-Mofidi, Sabine Heiland, Martin Kramer, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Martin Bendszus, Dominik F Vollherbst

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tabea C SchaeferDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Svenja GreiveDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Claas BierwischFraunhofer IWM, Freiburg, Germany.
Shoya Mohseni-MofidiFraunhofer IWM, Freiburg, Germany.
Sabine HeilandDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin KramerDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Small Animal Clinic, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Markus A MöhlenbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dominik F VollherbstDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany dominik.vollherbst@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8992-4757
Heidelberg University · DEFraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebral infarctions resulting from iatrogenic air embolism (AE), mainly caused by small air bubbles, are a well-known and often overlooked event in endovascular interventions. Despite their significance, the underlying pathophysiology remains largely unclear.

methodsIn 24 rats, AEs were induced using a microcatheter, positioned in the carotid artery via femoral access. Rats were divided into two study groups, based on the size of the bubbles (85 and 120 µm) and two sub-groups, differing in air volume (0.39 and 0.64 µl). Ultra-high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed 1.5 hours after intervention. MRI findings including the number, single volume and total volume of the infarctions were assessed. A software-based numerical simulation was performed to qualitatively assess the microvascular pathomechanisms.

resultsIn the study groups 22 of 24 rats (92%) revealed cerebral infarctions. The number of infarctions per rat was higher for the smaller bubbles, for the lower (medians: 5 vs 3; p=0.049) and higher air volume sub-groups (medians: 6 vs 4; p=0.012). Correspondingly, total infarction volume was higher for the smaller bubbles (1.67 vs 0.5 mm³; p=0.042). Simulations confirmed the results of the experiments and suggested that fusion of microbubbles to larger bubbles is the underlying pathomechanism of vascular occlusions.

conclusionIn iatrogenic AE, the size of the bubbles can have a major impact on the number and total volume of cerebral infarctions. These findings can help to better understand the pathophysiology of this frequent, often underestimated adverse event in endovascular interventions.

Indexed as

Cerebral InfarctionEmbolism, AirIatrogenic DiseaseAnimalsComputer SimulationDisease Models, AnimalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAngiographyCatheterComplicationInterventionStroke

Identifiers

PMID37673679
PMCPMC11420717
OpenAlexW4386493406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.