Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37673545›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Planetary health2023

Health-care systems' resource footprints and their access and quality in 49 regions between 1995 and 2015: an input-output analysis.

Baptiste Andrieu, Laurie Marrauld, Olivier Vidal, Mathis Egnell, Laurent Boyer, Guillaume Fond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Baptiste AndrieuInstitut de Sciences de la Terre (ISTerre), CNRS-University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France; The Shift Project, Paris, France. Electronic address: baptiste.andrieu@outlook.fr.
Laurie MarrauldThe Shift Project, Paris, France; Université Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, Inserm, Arènes-UMR 6051, RSMS (Recherche sur les Services et Management en Santé)-U 1309, Rennes, France.
Olivier VidalInstitut de Sciences de la Terre (ISTerre), CNRS-University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Mathis EgnellP4H Network-World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laurent BoyerFaculté des sciences médicales et paramédicales, AP-HM, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France; CEReSS-Centre d'Etude et de Recherche sur les Services de Santé et la Qualité de vie, Marseille, France; Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France.
Guillaume FondFaculté des sciences médicales et paramédicales, AP-HM, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France; CEReSS-Centre d'Etude et de Recherche sur les Services de Santé et la Qualité de vie, Marseille, France; Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France.
Ceres · USFondation FondaMental · FRInstitut des Sciences de la Terre · FRUniversité de Rennes · FRUniversité Gustave Eiffel · FRWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrategies to reduce the environmental impact of health care are often limited to greenhouse gas emissions. To broaden their scope, our aim was to determine the evolution of the resource footprints, dependency, and efficiency of health-care systems and to determine the relationship between this evolution and their Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) index.

methodsWe carried out an input-output analysis of 49 health-care systems from 1995 to 2015. We harmonised the EXIOBASE v3.8.2 database-providing data for 49 world regions-to the World Health Organization Health Expenditures Database. We then performed a panel data analysis to understand the relationship between Healthcare Access and Quality index and energy footprint per capita of health-care systems. EXIOBASE3 does not provide measurement errors so it was not possible to propagate the uncertainties as can be done with other input-output databases.

findingsHealth-care systems' footprint increased over the past two decades, reaching 7% of global non-metallic minerals footprint, 4% of global metal ores footprint, and 5% of global fossil fuels footprint in 2013. This increase was mostly due to China, rising from 7% of the non-metallic minerals footprint in 1995 to 45% in 2013. 80% of the health-care systems studied were dependent at more than 50% on fossil fuel imports. The energy footprint per capita was correlated exponentially with the HAQ index but some countries performed much better than others at a given energy footprint. Health-care systems have not become more efficient between 2002 and 2015.

interpretationHealth-care systems' resources footprint are exponentially linked to their HAQ. Both prevention and efficiency measures will be needed to change this relationship. If it is not enough, high-income countries will have to choose between further reducing the resource consumption of their health-care systems or shifting the efforts to other sectors, health being considered an incompressible need. We call for the creation of a HAQE (health-care access, quality, and efficiency) index that would add resource efficiency to access and quality when ranking health-care systems.

fundingThe Shift Project.

Indexed as

Greenhouse GasesHealth ExpendituresChinaFossil FuelsHealth FacilitiesFossil FuelsGreenhouse Gases

Identifiers

PMID37673545
PMCPMC10495829
OpenAlexW4386413339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.