ArticleClinical imaging2023
Virtual monoenergetic imaging in photon-counting CT of the head and neck.
Article in Clinical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photon-Counting Detector CT-Based Virtual Monoenergetic Imaging With Metal Artifact Reduction for Endodontic Diagnostics.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Photon-counting CT in neuroradiology: a comprehensive SWOT analysis.European radiology · 2026Review
- Photon-counting detector of the ophthalmic artery: impact of virtual monoenergetic levels, reconstruction kernel, and quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) on image quality.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Photon Dose Calculation on Photon-Counting Computed Tomography-A Comparison Study Based on Virtual Monoenergetic and Electron Density (Rho) Images for Pancreatic Cases.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- High yield clinical applications for photon counting CT in neurovascular imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Photon-counting CT for forensic death investigations-a glance into the future of virtual autopsy.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAdvantages of virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) have been reported for dual energy CT of the head and neck, and more recently VMIs derived from photon-counting (PCCT) angiography of the head and neck. We report image quality metrics of VMI in a PCCT angiography dataset, expanding the anatomical regions evaluated and extending observer-based qualitative methods further than previously reported.
methodsIn a prospective study, asymptomatic subjects underwent contrast enhanced PCCT of the head and neck using an investigational scanner. Image sets of low, high, and full spectrum (Threshold-1) energies; linear mix of low and high energies (Mix); and 23 VMIs (40-150 keV, 5 keV increments) were generated. In 8 anatomical locations, SNR and radiologists' preferences for VMI energy levels were measured using a forced-choice rank method (4 observers) and ratings of image quality using visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis (2 observers) comparing VMI to Mix and Threshold-1 images.
resultsFifteen subjects were included (7 men, 8 women, mean 57 years, range 46-75). Among all VMIs, SNRs varied by anatomic location. The highest SNRs were observed in VMIs. Radiologists preferred 50-60 keV VMIs for vascular structures and 75-85 keV for all other structures. Cumulative ratings of image quality averaged across all locations were higher for VMIs with areas under the curve of VMI vs Mix and VMI vs Threshold-1 of 0.67 and 0.68 for the first reader and 0.72 and 0.76 for the second, respectively.
conclusionPreferred keV level and quality ratings of VMI compared to mixed and Threshold-1 images varied by anatomical location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.