Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37672196›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023

Use of light-weight foaming polylactic acid as a lung-equivalent material in 3D printed phantoms.

Scott Crowe, Sarah Maxwell, Harsimran Brar, Liting Yu, Tanya Kairn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Production of heterogenous bone radiopacity phantom using 3D printing.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scott CroweCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. sb.crowe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7028-6452
Sarah MaxwellCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4817-4256
Harsimran BrarSchool of Chemistry and Physics, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Liting YuCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1264-9996
Tanya KairnCancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2136-6138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 3D printing of lung-equivalent phantoms using conventional polylactic acid (PLA) filaments requires the use of low in-fill printing densities, which can produce substantial density heterogeneities from the air gaps within the resulting prints. Light-weight foaming PLA filaments produce microscopic air bubbles when heated to 3D printing temperatures. In this study, the expansion of foaming PLA filament was characterised for two 3D printers with different nozzle diameters, in order to optimise the printing flow rates required to achieve a low density print when printed at 100% in-fill printing density, without noticeable internal air gaps. Effective densities as low as 0.28 g cm

Indexed as

PolyestersRadiometryLungPrinting, Three-DimensionalPolyesterspoly(lactide)3D printingLungPhantomsRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37672196
PMCPMC10703987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.