Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37672178›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2023

Impact of COVID-19 and system recovery in delivering healthcare to people with multiple sclerosis: a population-based Study.

Giuseppina Affinito, Ugo Trama, Laura Palumbo, Maria Grazia Fumo, Roberta Giordana, Massimo Di Gennaro, Maria Triassi, Roberta Lanzillo, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Raffaele Palladino and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppina AffinitoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Ugo TramaDrug Policy and Devices Unit, Regione Campania Health Department, Naples, Italy.
Laura PalumboDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Maria Grazia FumoRegional Healthcare Society (So.Re.Sa), Naples, Italy.
Roberta GiordanaRegional Healthcare Society (So.Re.Sa), Naples, Italy.
Massimo Di GennaroInnovation and Data Analytics (So.Re.Sa), Naples, Italy.
Maria TriassiDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Roberta LanzilloDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo Brescia MorraDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Raffaele PalladinoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. raffaele.palladino@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-812X
Marcello MocciaMultiple Sclerosis Unit, Policlinico Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Federico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITRegione Campania · IT

Funding

Regione Campania E65E22000370002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 pandemic has affected the management of multiple sclerosis (MS).

objectiveTo explore the impact of COVID-19 on healthcare delivery to people with MS and the subsequent recovery of the system.

methodsIn this population-based study in the Campania Region (Italy), we included people with MS across pre-COVID-19, lockdown, pre-vaccination, and vaccination periods. Differences in continuous outcomes between periods were explored using linear mixed models (annualized hospitalization rate (AHR) and adherence measured as medication possession ratio (MPR)). Differences in disease-modifying treatment (DMT) prescription rates (first DMT prescription, any DMT switch, switch from platform to highly effective DMT, and combination of first DMT prescription and any DMT switch) were assessed using an interrupted time series design.

resultsCompared with pre-COVID-19, AHR decreased during the lockdown (Coeff = 0.64;95%CI = -0.69, -0.59; p < 0.01), and remained lower during pre-vaccination and vaccination periods. Adherence decreased during pre-vaccination (Coeff = -0.04;95%CI = -0.05, -0.03; p < 0.01) and vaccination periods (Coeff = -0.07;95%CI = -0.08, -0.07; p < 0.01). After the lockdown, there was an increase in any DMT switch (IRR 2.05 95%CI 1.38,3.05; p < 0.01), in switch from platform to highly effective DMTs (IRR 4.45;95%CI 2.48,8.26; p < 0.01) and in first DMT prescriptions (IRR 2.48;95%CI 1.64,3.74; p < 0.01).

conclusionsDMT prescriptions quickly returned to pre-pandemic levels, reflecting good health system recovery. However, adherence has remained lower than the past, as from suboptimal care. Assessing long-term COVID-19 impact on MS healthcare is warranted.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiple SclerosisCommunicable Disease ControlDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesCOVID-19DMTsEpidemiologyHealthcareMultiple sclerosisPandemicRecovery

Identifiers

PMID37672178
PMCPMC10570189
OpenAlexW4386467156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.