SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2024
T Cell Exhaustion and Activation Markers in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global trends in resistance studies of gemcitabine and pancreatic cancer: a bibliometric and visual analysis from 2010 to 2024.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: integrating molecular insights for targeted interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Article
- Single-Cell Sequencing Unravels Pancreatic Cancer: Novel Technologies Reveal Novel Aspects of Cellular Heterogeneity and Inform Therapeutic Strategies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Study on the anti-tumor effect of PDL1-CAR-γδT cells constructed with nanobody sequences on glioblastoma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Immunological Profile and Markers of Endothelial Dysfunction in Elderly Patients with Cognitive Impairments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundT cell exhaustion and activation markers are helpful in determining the therapies and predicting the overall survival in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. PURPOSE: In this systematic review, we have addressed two questions, how do these markers differ in their expression levels in PC patients and healthy individual and correlating the expression level of these markers with the cancer stage.
methodsThe systematic review was registered with Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with registration number "CRD42022246780." All the included articles were obtained from three databases, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane, published from January 2010 to 26th May 2022. Two independent reviewers followed the PRISM protocol and reviewed and extracted data from the included articles.
resultsPD-1 and CTLA-4 were the most studied markers in this field. A clear elevation in the expression of PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, LAG-3, and TIGIT was found in most of the studies. CD69, CD25, and HLA-DR expression was found to be upregulated after chemotherapy and immunotherapy. CD25 was the only marker analyzed against cancer progression, in a single study. No study compared the expression of exhaustion and activation markers (except CD69) with the cancer progression of the tumor stage.
conclusionSince the exhaustion markers are upregulated in patients, single or multiple markers can be targeted in immunotherapies. Knowledge of the dynamics of these markers at various cancer stages will help in determining the right immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients. Stage-wise comparison could also be made possible by developing in vitro models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37672169What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.