ArticleJA clinical reports2023
Inadvertent catheter misplacement into the subclavian artery during ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous catheterization: a case report.
Article in JA clinical reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical patterns and clinical outcomes of central venous catheter malpositions: A systematic review of published case reports and case series.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Internal jugular vein catheterization and catheter insertion slipped into the cervical spinal canal: a special case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Rescue Procedure in a Rare Case of Iatrogenic Vertebral Artery Puncture and Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Workflow for treating inadvertent arterial placement of the central venous catheter.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2024Article
- Pitfalls in internal jugular vein cannulation.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Sonographic Detection of Iatrogenic Carotid Artery Guidewires During Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization.POCUS journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound-guided central venous catheterization has become a standard procedure. However, mechanical complications are still reported. CASE PRESENTATION: An 85-year-old woman presented with coagulopathic bladder tamponade. Ultrasound-guided right internal jugular venous catheterization was planned because of difficult peripheral venous access. A guidewire was advanced through a needle inserted at the midpoint of the right carotid triangle. The guidewire was identified in the short axis, but not in the long-axis ultrasound view, leading to inadvertent insertion of the catheter into the right subclavian artery through the internal jugular vein. Stent graft insertion was performed for perforation closure. The patient exhibited no symptoms of cerebral ischemia following stent graft insertion. DISCUSSION: This case demonstrated that the needle-sticking site should not be placed close to the clavicle for ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous catheterization, as it may not confirm the position of guidewire in the long-axis ultrasound view.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.