Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37672102›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

Prevalence and determinants of subretinal drusenoid deposits in patients' first-degree relatives.

Matthias M Mauschitz, Benedikt J Hochbein, Hannah Klinkhammer, Marlene Saßmannshausen, Jan H Terheyden, Peter Krawitz, Robert P Finger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias M Mauschitz *Department of Ophthalmology, University Bonn, Ernst-Abbe-Straße 2, 53127, Bonn, Germany. Matthias.Mauschitz@ukbonn.de.
Benedikt J Hochbein *Department of Ophthalmology, University Bonn, Ernst-Abbe-Straße 2, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Hannah KlinkhammerInstitute for Genomic Statistics and Bioinformatics, University Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Marlene SaßmannshausenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Bonn, Ernst-Abbe-Straße 2, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Jan H TerheydenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Bonn, Ernst-Abbe-Straße 2, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Peter KrawitzInstitute for Genomic Statistics and Bioinformatics, University Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Robert P FingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Bonn, Ernst-Abbe-Straße 2, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
University of Bonn · DEInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie, Informatik und Epidemiologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSubretinal drusenoid deposits (SDDs) are distinct extracellular alteration anterior to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Given their commonly uniform phenotype, a hereditary predisposition seems likely. Hence, we aim to investigate prevalence and determinants in patients' first-degree relatives.

methodsWe recruited SDD outpatients at their visits to our clinic and invited their relatives. We performed a full ophthalmic examination including spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and graded presence, disease stage of SDD as well as percentage of infrared (IR) en face area affected by SDD. Moreover, we performed genetic sequencing and calculated a polygenic risk score (PRS) for AMD. We conducted multivariable regression models to assess potential determinants of SDD and associations of SDD with PRS.

resultsWe included 195 participants, 123 patients (mean age 81.4 ± 7.2 years) and 72 relatives (mean age 52.2 ± 14.2 years), of which 7 presented SDD, resulting in a prevalence of 9.7%. We found older age to be associated with SDD presence and area in the total cohort and a borderline association of higher body mass index (BMI) with SDD presence in the relatives. Individuals with SDD tended to have a higher PRS, which, however, was not statistically significant in the multivariable regression.

conclusionOur study indicates a potential hereditary aspect of SDD and confirms the strong association with age. Based on our results, relatives of SDD patients ought to be closely monitored for retinal alterations, particularly at an older age. Further longitudinal studies with larger sample size and older relatives are needed to confirm or refute our findings.

Indexed as

Retinal DrusenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFluorescein AngiographyGenetic Risk ScoreHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetinal Pigment EpitheliumTomography, Optical CoherenceAge-related macular degenerationGeneticsImagingSubretinal drusenoid deposits

Identifiers

PMID37672102
PMCPMC10805990
OpenAlexW4386467429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.