ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Development and validation of a predictive model for the diagnosis of bladder tumors using narrow band imaging.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fatal Cytokine Collision: HLH-AIHA in Advanced AIDS-Case Report and Literature Review.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Global, regional, and national esophageal cancer deaths and DALYs attributable to diet low in vegetables and fruits, 1990-2019: analysis for the global burden of disease study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAt present, the prediction of bladder tumor nature during cystoscopy is partially dependent on the clinician's own experience. Subjective factors may lead to excessive biopsy or delayed treatment. The purpose of our study is to establish a reliable model for predicting the nature of bladder tumors using narrow band imaging.
methodsFrom November 2021 to November 2022, the clinical data of 231 patients who required a cystoscopy were prospectively collected at our center. Cystoscopy was performed in 219 eligible patients, in which both tumor and vascular morphology characteristics were recorded. Pathological results were used as the diagnostic standard. A logistic regression analysis was used to screen out factors related to tumor pathology. Bootstrap resampling was used for internal validation. A total of 71 patients from four other centers served as an external validation cohort.
resultsThe following diagnostic factors were identified: tumor morphology (cauliflower-like or algae-like lesions), vascular morphology (dotted or circumferential vessels), tumor boundary (clear or unclear), and patients' symptoms (gross hematuria) and were included in the prediction model. The internal validation results showed that the area under the curve was 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.97), and the P value from the goodness-of-fit test was 0.97. After external validation, the results showed the area under the curve was 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.97) and the P value of the goodness-of-fit test was 0.24.
conclusionA diagnostic prediction nomogram was established for bladder cancer. The verification results showed that the prediction model has good prediction performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.