Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37672075›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Development and external validation of the multichannel deep learning model based on unenhanced CT for differentiating fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: a two-center retrospective study.

Haohua Yao, Li Tian, Xi Liu, Shurong Li, Yuhang Chen, Jiazheng Cao, Zhiling Zhang, Zhenhua Chen, Zihao Feng, Quanhui Xu and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Haohua Yao *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Li Tian *Department of Medical Imaging, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Xi Liu *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shurong Li *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuhang ChenDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiazheng CaoDepartment of Urology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, China.
Zhiling ZhangDepartment of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenhua ChenDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zihao FengDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Quanhui XuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiangquan ZhuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yinghan WangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan GuoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Caixia LiSchool of Mathematics and Computational Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Peixing LiSchool of Mathematics and Computational Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Huanjun WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. wanghj45@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Junhang LuoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. luojunh@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

Guangzhou Science and Technology Projects 202201010910National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFC0902600National Natural Science Foundation of China 81725016, 81872094, 82272862, 81902576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are undetectable levels of fat in fat-poor angiomyolipoma. Thus, it is often misdiagnosed as renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to develop and evaluate a multichannel deep learning model for differentiating fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fp-AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

methodsThis two-center retrospective study included 320 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (FAHSYSU) and 132 patients from the Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC). Data from patients at FAHSYSU were divided into a development dataset (n = 267) and a hold-out dataset (n = 53). The development dataset was used to obtain the optimal combination of CT modality and input channel. The hold-out dataset and SYSUCC dataset were used for independent internal and external validation, respectively.

resultsIn the development phase, models trained on unenhanced CT images performed significantly better than those trained on enhanced CT images based on the fivefold cross-validation. The best patient-level performance, with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.951 ± 0.026 (mean ± SD), was achieved using the "unenhanced CT and 7-channel" model, which was finally selected as the optimal model. In the independent internal and external validation, AUCs of 0.966 (95% CI 0.919-1.000) and 0.898 (95% CI 0.824-0.972), respectively, were obtained using the optimal model. In addition, the performance of this model was better on large tumors (≥ 40 mm) in both internal and external validation.

conclusionThe promising results suggest that our multichannel deep learning classifier based on unenhanced whole-tumor CT images is a highly useful tool for differentiating fp-AML from RCC.

Indexed as

AngiomyolipomaCarcinoma, Renal CellDeep LearningKidney NeoplasmsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteCD36 AntigensDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedCD36 AntigensComputed tomographyDeep learningFat-poor angiomyolipomaRenal cell carcinomaUrology

Identifiers

PMID37672075
PMCPMC10620299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.