Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37672056›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Coronary computed tomography angiographic detection of in-stent restenosis via deep learning reconstruction: a feasibility study.

Hideki Kawai, Sadako Motoyama, Masayoshi Sarai, Yoshihiro Sato, Takahiro Matsuyama, Ryota Matsumoto, Hiroshi Takahashi, Akio Katagata, Yumi Kataoka, Yoshihiro Ida and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Hideki KawaiDepartment of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan. hkawai@fujita-hu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-3615
Sadako MotoyamaDepartment of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Masayoshi SaraiDepartment of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Yoshihiro SatoDepartment of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Takahiro MatsuyamaDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Ryota MatsumotoDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroshi TakahashiDepartment of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Akio KatagataDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Yumi KataokaDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Yoshihiro IdaDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Takashi MuramatsuDepartment of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Yoshiharu OhnoDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Yukio OzakiDepartment of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Hiroshi ToyamaDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Jagat NarulaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Heart, New York, NY, USA.
Hideo IzawaDepartment of Cardiology, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvaluation of in-stent restenosis (ISR), especially for small stents, remains challenging during computed tomography (CT) angiography. We used deep learning reconstruction to quantify stent strut thickness and lumen vessel diameter at the stent and compared it with values obtained using conventional reconstruction strategies.

methodsWe examined 166 stents in 85 consecutive patients who underwent CT and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 3 months of each other from 2019-2021 after percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary stent placement. The presence of ISR was defined as percent diameter stenosis ≥ 50% on ICA. We compared a super-resolution deep learning reconstruction, Precise IQ Engine (PIQE), and a model-based iterative reconstruction, Forward projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion (FIRST). All images were reconstructed using PIQE and FIRST and assessed by two blinded cardiovascular radiographers.

resultsPIQE had a larger full width at half maximum of the lumen and smaller strut than FIRST. The image quality score in PIQE was higher than that in FIRST (4.2 ± 1.1 versus 2.7 ± 1.2, p < 0.05). In addition, the specificity and accuracy of ISR detection were better in PIQE than in FIRST (p < 0.05 for both), with particularly pronounced differences for stent diameters < 3.0 mm.

conclusionPIQE provides superior image quality and diagnostic accuracy for ISR, even with stents measuring < 3.0 mm in diameter. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: With improvements in the diagnostic accuracy of in-stent stenosis, CT angiography could become a gatekeeper for ICA in post-stenting cases, obviating ICA in many patients after recent stenting with infrequent ISR and allowing non-invasive ISR detection in the late phase. KEY POINTS: • Despite CT technology advancements, evaluating in-stent stenosis severity, especially in small-diameter stents, remains challenging. • Compared with conventional methods, the Precise IQ Engine uses deep learning to improve spatial resolution. • Improved diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography helps avoid invasive coronary angiography after coronary artery stenting.

Indexed as

Coronary RestenosisDeep LearningComputed Tomography AngiographyConstriction, PathologicCoronary AngiographyFeasibility StudiesHumansStentsTomography, X-Ray ComputedCoronary artery diseaseMachine learningStent

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.