ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Results and analysis of examination doses for paediatric CT procedures based on a nationwide survey in China.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07199101 (Development of a Multicenter Low-Dose CT Protocol for Children Based on Low-Dose Simulation Technology and Verification by Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development of a Multicenter Low-Dose CT Protocol for Children Based on Low-Dose Simulation Technology and Verification by Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of arm position on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric toddler chest computed tomography: a phantom and clinical study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- High performance of low/ultralow-dose photon-counting CT for pulmonary metastasis in young musculoskeletal malignancy patients.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Analysis of intraoperative radiation exposure in paediatric orthopaedic and trauma patients: a comparative cohort study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Effects of various tilt angles on radiation dose and image quality in pediatric head computed tomography: A phantom study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Dual-Layer Detector Head CT to Maintain Image Quality While Reducing the Radiation Dose in Pediatric Patients.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo report the results of a dose survey conducted across 31 provinces in mainland China from 2017 to 2018 and to analyse the dose level to determine the national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for paediatric CT procedures.
methodsAt least ten patients for each age group (0- < 1, 1- < 5, 5- < 10, 10- < 15 years) and each procedure (head, chest and abdomen) for each CT scanner were selected from four to eight hospitals in each province. The dose information (CTDI
resultsA total of 24,395 patients and 319 CT scanners were investigated across 262 hospitals. For paediatric CT scanning in 4 different age groups, the median (P
conclusionThe dose level of CT scanning for children in mainland China was reported for the first time. The DRLs for paediatric CT in the present study are similar to those in some Asian countries but higher than those in European countries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The paediatric CT is an extensively used tool in diagnosing paediatric disease; however, children are more sensitive to radiation. Establishing the diagnostic reference level of paediatric CT examination is necessary to reduce the dose of CT in children and promote the optimisation of medical exposure. KEY POINTS: • The DRLs for 3 paediatric CT procedures (head, chest and abdomen) and 4 age groups (0- < 1, 1- < 5, 5- < 10, 10- < 15 years) were proposed in mainland China first time. • The examination parameter and dose for children need to be further optimised in China, especially to lower the tube voltage in paediatric CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.