Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37671660›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of social psychiatry2024

Did the prevalence of depressive symptoms change during the COVID-19 pandemic? A multilevel analysis on longitudinal data from healthcare workers.

Stephanie Hoffmann, Susanne Schulze, Antje Löffler, Juliane Becker, Frank Hufert, Heinz-Detlef Gremmels, Christine Holmberg, Michael A Rapp, Sonja Entringer, Jacob Spallek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of social psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Workload and mental health of nursing staff in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic-a scoping review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie HoffmannDepartment of Public Health, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6887-2831
Susanne SchulzeFaculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Joint Faculty of the University of Potsdam, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg and Brandenburg Medical School, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0389-8157
Antje LöfflerDepartment of Public Health, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany.
Juliane BeckerInstitute for Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Diagnostics and Microbiology, Sana Kliniken Niederlausitz gGmbH, Senftenberg, Germany.
Frank HufertDepartment of Microbiology and Virology, Medical University Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany.
Heinz-Detlef GremmelsInstitute for Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Diagnostics and Microbiology, Sana Kliniken Niederlausitz gGmbH, Senftenberg, Germany.
Christine HolmbergFaculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Joint Faculty of the University of Potsdam, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg and Brandenburg Medical School, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8852-4620
Michael A RappFaculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Joint Faculty of the University of Potsdam, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg and Brandenburg Medical School, Germany.
Sonja EntringerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Psychology, Germany.
Jacob SpallekDepartment of Public Health, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6312-034X
Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DEMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DESana Klinikum Lichtenberg · DEUniversity of Potsdam · DEUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare workers (HCW) are at high risk to develop mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic because of additional work load, perceived stress, and exposure to patients with COVID-19. Currently, there are few studies on change over time in the prevalence of depressive symptoms during pandemic start among HCW. Thus, the aims of the current study were to examine whether depressive symptoms increased during the pandemic and were associated with perceived stress and own COVID-19 infection and workplace exposure to virus-infected patients.

methodsThe cohort study used longitudinal data from HCW collected monthly (July 2020 till December 2020) during the first year of the pandemic before vaccination became available. The sample of

resultsDepression scores increased significantly during the study period (β = .03, 95% CI [0.02, 0.05]). Perceived stress was associated with depressive symptoms (β = .12, 95% CI [0.10, 0.14]) but did not change over time. Exposure to COVID-19 infection was associated with a higher increase of depressive symptoms (β = .12, 95% CI [0.10, .14]). Somatic symptoms of depression increased among medical HCW with workplace exposure to COVID-19 (β = .25, 95% CI [0.13, 0.38]), but not in administrators (β = .03, 95% CI [-0.04, 0.11]).

conclusionResearch is needed to identify factors that promote the reduction of depressive symptoms in medical HCW with exposition to COVID-19 patients. Awareness of infection protection measures should be increased.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cohort StudiesDepressionHealth PersonnelHumansMultilevel AnalysisPandemicsPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Depressive symptomshealthcare workerspandemic

Identifiers

PMID37671660
PMCPMC10860357
OpenAlexW4386467378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.