SynthesisJournal of biosciences2023
Antibody titers of individuals vaccinated for COVID-19: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of biosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An important preventive measure to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic is vaccine implementation. In creating vaccines, evoking neutralizing antibody (NAb) production is the main objective. This review determines and compares the NAb titers produced by COVID-19 vaccine recipients based on the vaccine type and the manner of administration. This review includes published articles on studies with healthy participants with a minimum age of 18 years, without previous infections, and those who were given Emergency Use License (EUL) vaccines from WHO. Bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias and the Newcastle- Ottawa Scale. In all the studies, 40.82% of the primary doses were viral vector platforms. For booster doses, 50% were mRNA platforms. Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have higher titers as homologous than as heterologous vaccines. However, inactivated vaccines and viral vector vaccines have lower titers as homologous than as heterologous vaccines. Meanwhile, subunit vaccines lack data for their titers. Based on the antibody titers, homologous mRNA vaccines are more viral-protective than their heterologous counterparts. Heterologous inactivated and viral vector vaccines are more protective than homologous combinations, mainly when mRNA is the other type in those heterologous combinations. This is because mRNA vaccines elicit higher immunogenicity compared to other types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37671533W4386387848What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.