Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37671304›Full record

ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis

Optimal Timing of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Conservative Therapy for Acute Cholecystitis.

Yuta Enami, Takeshi Aoki, Kodai Tomioka, Takahito Hirai, Hideki Shibata, Kazuhiko Saito, Shodai Nagaishi, Yojiro Takano, Junichi Seki, Shoji Shimada and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuta EnamiDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Takeshi AokiDepartment of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Showa University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kodai TomiokaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Takahito HiraiDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Hideki ShibataDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Kazuhiko SaitoDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Shodai NagaishiDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Yojiro TakanoDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Junichi SekiDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Shoji ShimadaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Kenta NakaharaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Yusuke TakeharaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Shumpei MukaiDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Naruhiko SawadaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Fumio IshidaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Shin-Ei KudoDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital · JPShowa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aim: According to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018, the operation for acute cholecystitis is recommended to be performed as early as possible. However, there are cases in which early surgeries cannot be performed due to complications of patients or facility conditions, resulting in elective surgery. Hence, we retrospectively analyzed elective surgery cases in this study. Patients and Methods: There were 345 patients who were underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) at our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 in this retrospective study. A total of 83 patients underwent LC more than 3 days after conservative treatment. The elective LC patients were divided into the Early group (4-90 days after onset, n=36) and the Delayed group [91 days or more (13 weeks or more) after onset, n=31], excluding 16 patients who underwent percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage. Results: As for operative time, there was a significant difference between the Delayed and Early groups (91.2 vs. 117 minutes, p=0.0108). And also, there was a significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay, which was significantly shorter in the Delayed group than in the Early group (3.4 vs. 5.9 days, p=0.0436). Although there were no significant differences in either conversion rates or complication rates, both of these were decreasing in the Delayed group. In particular, there were no complications in the Delayed group. Conclusion: When the conservative treatment for acute cholecystitis precedes and precludes urgent/early LC within 3 days, delaying LC for at least 91 days (13 weeks or more) after onset could reduce operative time and postoperative hospital stay. Moreover, there would be no complications after LC, and the rates of conversion during LC may be kept low.

Indexed as

Cholecystitisconservative treatmentdelayed surgerylaparoscopic cholecystectomyoptimal timing

Identifiers

PMID37671304
PMCPMC10475920
OpenAlexW4386371822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.