ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2023
Dual mechanical valve thrombosis resolution through thrombolytics: a case series.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a severe complication of mechanical valve replacement. Simultaneous thrombosis of multiple prosthetic valves is rare and is associated with worse outcomes. Treatment options include anticoagulation, thrombolysis, and redo operative valve replacement, with rare reports of adjunctive balloon valvuloplasty. There is limited evidence to guide therapeutic selection, specifically dosing, timing, and duration of thrombolysis. The following case series highlights the importance of successful thrombolytic management in dual PVT with high bleeding risk defined as a coagulopathy with an elevated international normalized ratio greater than 3 and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III and IV heart failure. Case summary: We describe two patients with concomitant aortic and mitral PVT. Both patients presented in NYHA Class III and IV heart failure with different challenges to surgical treatments including high bleeding risk from coagulopathy and history of multiple prior sternotomies. After multi-disciplinary discussions, both patients underwent a combination of low-dose, slow, or ultra-slow infusion of tissue plasminogen activator, with a resolution of their dual PVT seen on cine-fluoroscopy imaging as freely moving mechanical leaflets and improvement of heart failure symptoms back to baseline NYHA Class II or lower. Discussion: Prosthetic valve thrombosis is a complex medical condition requiring a multi-disciplinary team to evaluate the best course of treatment. A trial of pharmacologic thrombolysis is often the first attempted treatment for obstructive PVT, although surgery is recommended for patients with NYHA IV symptoms, or with contraindications to thrombolysis, including high bleeding risk. However, in patients with high bleeding risk and NYHA Class III and IV heart failure, especially with surgical contraindications, low-dose thrombolytics, with slow or ultra-slow infusions, may still be safe and effective treatment strategies for multi-valve PVT. Further research is needed to guide thrombolysis in multi-valve PVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.