ArticleCureus2023
Anxiety and Depression in COVID Survivors - A Cross-Sectional Study Six Months Past the Acute Illness.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive factors of anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Studies exploring the long-term psychiatric sequelae of COVID-19 are sparse. We aimed to assess depression and anxiety six months after recovery and the association between disease severity and psychiatric sequelae. Material and methods Our study was a comparative study conducted on COVID-19 disease survivors at a tertiary hospital. We compared Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) scores between mild (n=50), moderate (n=50), severe cases (n=50), and controls (n=50). We assessed the severity of depression and anxiety using the HDRS and the HAM-A. Cases: First-time COVID-19 survivors six months post-recovery. Cases were healthy pre-COVID. To the study date, controls were negative for COVID-19 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results Our study of 200 subjects indicated that mean (mean, SD) HAM-A scores in cases (14.7, 5.6) were higher than controls (7.9, 1.7), and HDRS scores in cases (17.3, 6.3) were higher than controls (7.5, 1.9). HAM-A scores in severe cases (19.5, 4.8) were higher than in moderate cases (17.0, 3.9), and scores in moderate cases were higher than in mild cases (10.6, 2.4). HDRS scores in severe cases (22.5, 5.9) were higher than in moderate cases (16.4, 3.2), and scores in moderate cases were higher than in mild cases (14.4, 2.5). Among the cases, there was a positive correlation between the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores and the duration of hospital stay, ICU stay, and use of invasive oxygen. These parameters were not applicable to the controls; hence, they were not included in the comparative analysis. Conclusions Patients, even after six months of recovery from COVID-19, had symptoms of anxiety and depression. The severity of anxiety and depression in survivors correlates with the severity of the COVID-19 disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.