Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37671196›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2023

Elucidating the interactive impact of tillage, residue retention and system intensification on pearl millet yield stability and biofortification under rainfed agro-ecosystems.

Akshay K Yogi, Ram Swaroop Bana, Samarth Godara, Seema Sangwan, Anil K Choudhary, Ravi C Nirmal, Shanti D Bamboriya, Yashbir S Shivay, Deepak Singh, Teekam Singh and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Akshay K Yogi *Division of Agronomy, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Ram Swaroop Bana *Division of Agronomy, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Samarth GodaraDivision of Computer Applications, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Seema SangwanDivision of Microbiology, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Anil K ChoudharyDivision of Agronomy, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Ravi C NirmalDivision of Agronomy, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Shanti D BamboriyaIndian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Maize Research Institute, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Yashbir S ShivayDivision of Agronomy, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Deepak SinghDivision of Computer Applications, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Teekam SinghDivision of Agronomy, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Achchhelal YadavDivision of Agricultural Physics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Shivani NagarDivision of Plant Physiology, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Nirupma SinghDivision of Genetics, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research · INIndian Agricultural Research Institute · INIndian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micronutrient malnutrition and suboptimal yields pose significant challenges in rainfed cropping systems worldwide. To address these issues, the implementation of climate-smart management strategies such as conservation agriculture (CA) and system intensification of millet cropping systems is crucial. In this study, we investigated the effects of different system intensification options, residue management, and contrasting tillage practices on pearl millet yield stability, biofortification, and the fatty acid profile of the pearl millet. ZT systems with intercropping of legumes (cluster bean, cowpea, and chickpea) significantly increased productivity (7-12.5%), micronutrient biofortification [Fe (12.5%), Zn (4.9-12.2%), Mn (3.1-6.7%), and Cu (8.3-16.7%)], protein content (2.2-9.9%), oil content (1.3%), and fatty acid profile of pearl millet grains compared to conventional tillage (CT)-based systems with sole cropping. The interactive effect of tillage, residue retention, and system intensification analyzed using GGE statistical analysis revealed that the best combination for achieving stable yields and micronutrient fortification was residue retention in both (wet and dry) seasons coupled with a ZT pearl millet + cowpea-mustard (both with and without barley intercropping) system. In conclusion, ZT combined with residue recycling and legume intercropping can be recommended as an effective approach to achieve stable yield levels and enhance the biofortification of pearl millet in rainfed agroecosystems of South Asia.

Indexed as

conservation agriculturenutrient biofortificationpearl milletresidue retentionsystem intensificationzero tillage

Identifiers

PMID37671196
PMCPMC10475997
OpenAlexW4386033031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.