Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37671125›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2023

Changes to healthcare utilisation and symptoms for common mental health problems over the first 21 months of the COVID-19 pandemic: parallel analyses of electronic health records and survey data in England.

Vicky P Taxiarchi, Morwenna Senior, Darren M Ashcroft, Matthew J Carr, Holly Hope, Matthew Hotopf, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Sally McManus, Praveetha Patalay, Sarah Steeg and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Elevated levels of mental health issues among optometrists in the United Kingdom.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Vicky P TaxiarchiFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Centre for Women's Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Morwenna SeniorFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Centre for Women's Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Darren M AshcroftFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Matthew J CarrFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Holly HopeFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Centre for Women's Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Matthew HotopfDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Evangelos KontopantelisFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sally McManusViolence and Society Centre, City, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
Praveetha PatalayCentre for Longitudinal Studies and MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah SteegDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Roger T WebbNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration (GM PSRC), University of Manchester, UK.
Kathryn M AbelFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Centre for Women's Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Matthias PierceFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Centre for Women's Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBCity, University of London · GBKing's College London · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Few studies have investigated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health beyond 2020. This study quantifies changes to healthcare utilisation and symptoms for common mental health problems over the pandemic's first 21 months. Methods: Parallel cohort studies using primary care database and survey data for adults (≥16 years) in England from January 2015 to December 2021: 16,551,842 from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and 40,699 from the UK Household Longitudinal Survey (UKHLS). Interrupted time-series models estimated changes in monthly prevalence of presentations and prescribed medications for anxiety and depression (CPRD); and self-reported psychological distress (UKHLS). The pandemic period was divided into five phases: 1st Wave (April-May 2020); post-1st Wave (June-September 2020); 2nd Wave (October 2020-February 2021); post 2nd Wave (March-May 2021); 3rd Wave (June-December 2021). Findings: Primary care presentations for depression or anxiety dropped during the first wave (4.6 fewer monthly appointments per 1000 patients, 4.4-4.8) and remained lower than expected throughout follow-up. Self-reported psychological distress exceeded expected levels during the first (Prevalence Ratio = 1.378, 95% CI 1.289-1.459) and second waves (PR = 1.285, 1.189-1.377), returning towards expected levels during the third wave (PR = 1.038, 0.929-1.154). Increases in psychological distress and declines in presentations were greater for women. The decrease in primary care presentations for depression and anxiety exceeded that for physical health conditions (rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, urinary tract infections). Anxiety and depression prescriptions returned to pre-pandemic levels during the second wave due to increased repeat prescriptions. Interpretation: Despite periods of distress during the pandemic, we did not find an enduring effect on common mental health problems. The fall in primary care presentations for anxiety or depression suggests changing healthcare utilisation for mental distress and a potential treatment gap. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).

Indexed as

AdultsAnxietyCommon mental health problemsCOVID-19 pandemicDepressionPrimary carePsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID37671125
PMCPMC10477036
OpenAlexW4384944669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.