Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37670872›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Impact of conservation tillage on wheat performance and its microbiome.

Ida Romano, Natacha Bodenhausen, Gottlieb Basch, Miguel Soares, Hanna Faist, Friederike Trognitz, Angela Sessitsch, Marcé Doubell, Stéphane Declerck, Sarah Symanczik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Ida RomanoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Division of Microbiology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Natacha BodenhausenDepartment of Soil Sciences, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland.
Gottlieb BaschMED - Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Miguel SoaresMED - Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Hanna FaistAIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Tulln, Austria.
Friederike TrognitzAIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Tulln, Austria.
Angela SessitschAIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Tulln, Austria.
Marcé DoubellMycology, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Stéphane DeclerckMycology, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Sarah SymanczikDepartment of Soil Sciences, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland.
Austrian Institute of Technology · ATForschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau · CHUCLouvain · BEUniversity of Évora · PTUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Winter wheat is an important cereal consumed worldwide. However, current management practices involving chemical fertilizers, irrigation, and intensive tillage may have negative impacts on the environment. Conservation agriculture is often presented as a sustainable alternative to maintain wheat production, favoring the beneficial microbiome. Here, we evaluated the impact of different water regimes (rainfed and irrigated), fertilization levels (half and full fertilization), and tillage practices (occasional tillage and no-tillage) on wheat performance, microbial activity, and rhizosphere- and root-associated microbial communities of four winter wheat genotypes (Antequera, Allez-y, Apache, and Cellule) grown in a field experiment. Wheat performance (i.e., yield, plant nitrogen concentrations, and total nitrogen uptake) was mainly affected by irrigation, fertilization, and genotype, whereas microbial activity (i.e., protease and alkaline phosphatase activities) was affected by irrigation. Amplicon sequencing data revealed that habitat (rhizosphere vs. root) was the main factor shaping microbial communities and confirmed that the selection of endophytic microbial communities takes place thanks to specific plant-microbiome interactions. Among the experimental factors applied, the interaction of irrigation and tillage influenced rhizosphere- and root-associated microbiomes. The findings presented in this work make it possible to link agricultural practices to microbial communities, paving the way for better monitoring of these microorganisms in the context of agroecosystem sustainability.

Indexed as

amplicon sequencingfertilizationirrigationsoil microbiometillagewheat genotype

Identifiers

PMID37670872
PMCPMC10475739
OpenAlexW4386026744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.