ArticleHealth science reports2023
Application of CT pulmonary angiography and echocardiography in acute pulmonary embolism: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is an acute and potentially fatal condition defined as the blockage of pulmonary arteries by an embolism that can be from various origins. Objective: The present study aimed to investigate the findings of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and echocardiography in patients with acute PE. Methods: The present cross-sectional study included some patients with clinical manifestations of PE who underwent CTPA and echocardiography. The radiologic findings, PE severity, and outcome of the patients were recorded. Moreover, echocardiography was performed by an expert cardiologist using a high-resolution device, while CTPA was performed by an expert radiologist using a 16-slice device and a two-step selective test bolus method. Results: According to our findings, a total number of 147 patients were diagnosed with PE, including 44 (29.93%), 44 (29.93%), and 59 (40.14%) cases of mild, moderate, and severe PE, respectively. Moreover, 25 patients (17%) finally expired due to PE. Regarding the CTPA findings, 31 patients (21.1%) had septum flattening, while 35 (23.8%) had a septum deviation toward the left ventricle. Also, there were significant correlations between mortality and some CTPA findings, including severe PE ( Conclusion: CTPA is a valid and accessible modality for diagnosing and evaluating PE in suspected patients. Moreover, several findings in CTPA could predict adverse outcomes, such as death, in patients with PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.