Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37670761›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2023

Evaluation of a simple activity measurement method in rats.

Jun Goto, Ryoichi Nishida, Shogo Terayama, Takuya Mori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun GotoGraduate School of Health Science, Kio University, Japan.
Ryoichi NishidaGraduate School of Health Science, Kio University, Japan.
Shogo TerayamaGraduate School of Health Science, Kio University, Japan.
Takuya MoriDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Nara Medical University, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] Behavioral analysis is widely used in animal research. However, such analysis requires specialized equipment and can be difficult to perform. Therefore, this study aimed to explore and validate a simple behavioral analysis method. [Participants and Methods] For behavioral assessments, Wistar rats were placed in a rearing cage and videotaped from two directions: overhead and side view. The filmed videos were analyzed using ImageJ software to calculate the distance traveled and activity and inactivity times of the rats. Intraclass correlation coefficients 1 and 2 were calculated to examine the reliability of the behavioral analysis method. [Results] Intraclass correlation coefficients 1 and 2 for distance traveled and activity and inactivity times determined using the behavioral analysis method showed high reliability. [Conclusion] The behavioral analysis method validated in this study used inexpensive and easily accessible equipment and devices. The results show high correlation coefficients for the measurement of distance traveled and activity time performed by experimental animals, demonstrating the reliability of this simple method.

Indexed as

Behavioral analysisIntraclass correlation coefficientSimple methods

Identifiers

PMID37670761
PMCPMC10475646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.