ArticleClinical and translational science2023
Genomics and transcriptomic alterations of the glutamate receptors in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paradoxical Expression of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors in Leucocytes.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Article
- Genomics and transcriptomic alterations of the glutamate receptors in acute myeloid leukemia.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Glutamine and glutamate have been widely explored as potential therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In addition to its bioenergetic role in leukemia cell proliferation, L-glutamate is a neurotransmitter that acts on glutamate receptors. However, the role of glutamate receptors in AML is largely understudied. Here, we comprehensively analyze the genomic and transcriptomic alterations of glutamate receptor genes in AML using publicly available data. We investigated the frequency of mutations in the glutamate receptor genes and whether an association exist between the presence of these mutations and clinical and molecular characteristics or patient's clinical outcome. We also assessed the dysregulation of glutamate receptor gene expression in AML with and without mutations and whether gene dysregulation is associated with clinical outcomes. We found that 29 (14.5%) of 200 patients with AML had a mutation in at least one glutamate receptor gene. The DNMT3A mutations were significantly more frequent in patients with mutations in at least one glutamate receptor gene compared with patients without mutations (13 of 29 [44.8%] vs. 41 of 171 [23.9%], p value: 0.02). Notably, patients with mutations in at least one glutamate receptor gene survived shorter than patients without mutations; however, the results did not reach statistical significance (overall survival: 15.5 vs. 19.0 months; p value: 0.10). Mutations in the glutamate receptor genes were not associated with changes in gene expression and the transcriptomic levels of glutamate receptor genes were not associated with clinical outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.