Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37670376›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

MEsh FIxation in Laparoendsocopic Repair of Large M3 inguinal hernias: multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial-study protocol for a MEFI Trial.

Mateusz Zamkowski, Maciej Śmietański

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05678465 nacompletednot on this map

MEsh FIxation in Laparoendoscopic Repair of Large M3 Inguinal Hernias - Multicenter, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwissmed HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled204ConditionsHernia, Inguinal, Hernia, Direct InguinalArmsNon-fixation of the mesh, Fixation of the mesh
NCT07289802 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of the 3DMax MID Anatomical Mesh (BD, USA) in Laparoendoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSwissmed HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsHernia, InguinalArms3DMax MID Anatomical Mesh
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mateusz ZamkowskiGeneral Surgery and Hernia Centre, Swissmed Hospital, Gdańsk, Poland. zamek@wp.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9847-4188
Maciej ŚmietańskiGeneral Surgery and Hernia Centre, Swissmed Hospital, Gdańsk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLHernia Center · US

Funding

European Hernia Society Research Grant 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational guidelines of groin hernia treatment strongly recommend to fixate the mesh in large M3 medial defects during TAPP/TEP procedures. The main purpose of fixation is to decrease the recurrence rate which is alarmingly high in case of those defects. In 2022, a team consisting of hernia surgeons and scientists from universities of technology conducted an experimental study with the use of 3D groin model to verify the hypothesis that fixation is not necessary in above cases. Experiment showed that rigid and anatomically shaped meshes are able to maintain its position in the groin without fixation. Similar conclusions were recently published in Swedish database registry analysis. To confirm above results, we decided to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

methodsMain objective of MEFI Trial is to verify the hypothesis that non-fixation of spatial, standard polypropylene meshes is non-inferior to fixation of flat, polypropylene lightweight meshes in M3 hernias by laparoendoscopic approach. Eleven large surgery centers in Poland having proficiency in laparoendoscopic groin hernia repairs were recruited for this study. Recurrence in 12-month follow-up was set as a primary endpoint. Pain sensation (Visual Analog Scale) and incidence of other complications (hematoma, seroma, SSI) were also noted. Based on the statistical analysis, minimal sample size in both arms was established at 83-102. The first arm (control) consists of patients undergoing a repair with the use of a flat, macroporous mesh with fixation using histoacryl glue. In the second arm, patients will be operated with the use of anatomically shaped, standard-weight mesh without fixation. Study will be double-blinded (patient/surgeon). After the dissection of preperitoneal space, surgeon will open a sealed envelope and find out which technique he will have to perform. Follow-up will be performed by Study Secretary (also blinded to the method used) via phone call 3 and 12 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: Based on experimental study and recent registry analysis, we believe that the recurrence rate in both groups would be on the same level, giving hernia societies a strong argument for amending the guidelines.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05678465. Registered on 10 January 2023.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalSurgeonsDissectionHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPolypropylenesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical MeshPolypropylenesGroin herniaHerniaInguinal herniaLaparoendoscopyMedial herniaMeshMiniinvasiveTAPPTEP

Identifiers

PMID37670376
PMCPMC10478416
OpenAlexW4386441353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.