ArticleBMC veterinary research2023
Isolation, characterization and antimicrobial resistance of Yersinia enterocolitica from Polish cattle and their carcasses.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the Microbiological Quality of Raw Milk Sold Through Vending Machines at the Farm Level in Switzerland.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Molecular characterization and antimicrobial resistance ofItalian journal of food safety · 2026Article
- Microbiological safety of ungulates meat intended to be frozen and defrosting of frozen ungulates meat.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- An investigative study on Yersinia enterocolitica in animals, humans and dried milk in New Valley Governorate, Egypt.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Correction: Isolation, characterization and antimicrobial resistance of Yersinia enterocolitica from Polish cattle and their carcasses.BMC veterinary research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundYersinia enterocolitica is a heterogeneous bacterial species that has been divided into six biotypes and more than 70 serotypes. Each year, the European Food Safety Authority classifies yersiniosis caused by Y. enterocolitica as one of the most important zoonotic diseases. The prevalence of Y. enterocolitica in cattle has not been thoroughly analyzed in Poland, and beef and bovine carcasses contaminated with antimicrobial resistant Y. enterocolitica pose a health risk for both, farm workers and consumers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Y. enterocolitica in cattle and to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolated strains.
resultsA total of 1020 samples were analyzed, including 660 rectal swabs collected from live cattle and 360 swabs from cold-stored beef carcasses. The results of this study indicate that Y. enterocolitica was isolated from three of the 15 examined cattle herds and the prevalence within these herds ranged from 0% to nearly 32%. Y. enterocolitica was isolated from 14.7% of the examined heifers, 7.4% of calves and 5.5% of adult cows. More than 65% of the strains were isolated from cold enrichment. The strains isolated from live cattle tested positive for the ystB gene, while ail and ystA genes were not found. Most of the isolated strains belonged to bioserotype 1A/NT. The majority of the isolated strains were resistant to ampicillin, cefalexin and amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, however these are expected phenotypes for Y. enterocolitica.
conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that Y. enterocolitica is present in cattle herds in Poland. The strains isolated from live cattle were ystB-positive, most of them belonged to bioserotype 1A/NT. The prevalence of Y. enterocolitica strains was generally low in cold-stored beef carcasses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.