Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37670277›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Utilization of patient portals: a cross-sectional study investigating associations with mobile app quality.

Noha El Yaman, Jad Zeitoun, Rawan Diab, Mohamad Mdaihly, Razan Diab, Lynn Kobeissi, Salwa Abou Ljoud, Jumana Antoun, Marco Bardus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noha El YamanFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Jad ZeitounFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Rawan DiabFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mohamad MdaihlyFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Razan DiabFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Lynn KobeissiFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Salwa Abou LjoudFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Jumana AntounDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. ja46@aub.edu.lb.
Marco BardusInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. m.bardus@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile apps facilitate patients' access to portals and interaction with their healthcare providers. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this trend globally, but little evidence exists on patient portal usage in the Middle East, where internet access and digital literacy are limited. Our study aimed to explore how users utilize a patient portal through its related mobile app (MyChart by EPIC).

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of MyChart users, recruited from a tertiary care center in Lebanon. We collected MyChart usage patterns, perceived outcomes, and app quality, based on the Mobile Application Rating Scale (user version, uMARS), and sociodemographic factors. We examined associations between app usage, app quality, and sociodemographic factors using Pearson's correlations, Chi-square, ANOVA, and t-tests.

results428 users completed the survey; they were primarily female (63%), aged 41.3 ± 15.6 years, with a higher education level (87%) and a relatively high crowding index of 1.4 ± 0.6. Most of the sample was in good and very good health (78%) and had no chronic illnesses (67%), and accessed the portal through MyChart once a month or less (76%). The most frequently used features were accessing health records (98%), scheduling appointments (67%), and messaging physicians (56%). According to uMARS completers (n = 200), the objective quality score was 3.8 ± 0.5, and the subjective quality was 3.6 ± 0.7. No significant association was found between overall app usage and the mobile app quality measured via uMARS. Moreover, app use frequency was negatively associated with education, socioeconomic status, and perceived health status. On the other hand, app use was positively related to having chronic conditions, the number of physician visits and subjective app quality.

conclusionThe patient portal usage was not associated with app quality but with some of the participants' demographic factors. The app offers a user-friendly, good-quality interface to patient health records and physicians, appreciated chiefly by users with relatively low socioeconomic status and education. While this is encouraging, more research is needed to capture the usage patterns and perceptions of male patients and those with even lower education and socioeconomic status, to make patient portals more inclusive.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mobile ApplicationsPatient PortalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLebanonMalePandemicsElectronic Health RecordLebanonmHealthMiddle EastPatient portalsUsabilityUsage frequency

Identifiers

PMID37670277
PMCPMC10481578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.