Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37670236›Full record

Observational studyBMC psychiatry2023

Telemedicine treatment of patients with mental disorders during and after the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Germany - an observational study on feasibility and patient satisfaction.

Karsten Link, Svenja Christians, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Hans Jörgen Grabe, Neeltje van den Berg

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karsten LinkInstitut Für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany. karsten.link@gmx.de.
Svenja ChristiansKlinik Und Poliklinik Für Psychiatrie Und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Wolfgang HoffmannInstitut Für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Hans Jörgen GrabeKlinik Und Poliklinik Für Psychiatrie Und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Neeltje van den BergInstitut Für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a general lockdown was enacted across Germany in March 2020. As a consequence, patients with mental health conditions received limited or no treatment in day hospitals and outpatient settings. To ensure continuity of care, the necessary technological preparations were made to enable the implementation of telemedical care via telephone or video conferencing, and this option was then used as much as possible. The aim of this study was to investigate the satisfaction and acceptance with telemedical care in a heterogeneous patient group of psychiatric outpatients in Germany during the first COVID-19 lockdown.

methodsIn this observational study, patients in ongoing or newly initiated outpatient psychiatric therapy as well as those who had to be discharged from the day clinic ahead of schedule received telemedical treatment via telephone. Data collection to assess the patients' and therapists' satisfaction with and acceptance of the telemedical care was adjusted to the treatment setting.

resultsOf 60 recruited patients, 57 could be included in the analysis. 51.6% of the patients and 52.3% of their therapists reported that the discussion of problems and needs worked just as well over the phone as in face-to-face consultations. In the subgroup of patients who were new to therapy due to being discharged from hospital early, acceptance was higher and telemedicine was rated as equally good in 87.5% of contacts. Both patients and therapists felt that telemedicine care during lockdown was an alternative for usual therapy in the outpatient clinic and that the option of telemedicine care should continue for the duration of the coronavirus pandemic. DISCUSSION: The results show a clear trend towards satisfaction with and acceptance of telemedicine care in a heterogeneous group of unselected psychiatric patients. Although the number of patients is small, the results indicate that the mostly positive results of telemedicine concepts in research projects can probably be transferred to real healthcare settings.

conclusionsTelemedicine can be employed in healthcare for psychiatric patients either an alternative treatment option to maintain continuity of care or as a potential addition to regular care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental DisordersTelemedicineCommunicable Disease ControlFeasibility StudiesGermanyHumansOutpatientsPandemicsPatient SatisfactionAcceptanceCOVID-19 pandemicLockdownPsychiatric outpatientsSatisfactionTelemedical treatmentTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37670236
PMCPMC10478407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.