Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37670193›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023

The role of parametric feature maps to correct different volume of interest sizes: an in vivo liver MRI study.

Laura Jacqueline Jensen, Damon Kim, Thomas Elgeti, Ingo Günter Steffen, Lars-Arne Schaafs, Bernd Hamm, Sebastian Niko Nagel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura Jacqueline Jensen *Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany. laura-jacqueline.jensen@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6436-5733
Damon Kim *Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany. damon.kim@helios-gesundheit.de.
Thomas ElgetiCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Ingo Günter SteffenCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Lars-Arne SchaafsCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Bernd HammCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian Niko NagelCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent volume of interest (VOI) sizes influence radiomic features. This study examined if translating images into feature maps before feature sampling could compensate for these effects in liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsT1- and T2-weighted sequences from three different scanners (two 3-T scanners, one 1.5-T scanner) of 66 patients with normal abdominal MRI were included retrospectively. Three differently sized VOIs (10, 20, and 30 mm in diameter) were drawn in the liver parenchyma (right lobe), excluding adjacent structures. Ninety-three features were extracted conventionally using PyRadiomics. All images were also converted to 93 parametric feature maps using a pretested software. Agreement between the three VOI sizes was assessed with overall concordance correlation coefficients (OCCCs), while OCCCs > 0.85 were rated reproducible. OCCCs were calculated twice: for the VOI sizes of 10, 20, and 30 mm and for those of 20 and 30 mm.

resultsWhen extracted from original images, only 4 out of the 93 features were reproducible across all VOI sizes in T1- and T2-weighted images. When the smallest VOI was excluded, 5 features (T1-weighted) and 7 features (T2-weighted) were reproducible. Extraction from parametric maps increased the number of reproducible features to 9 (T1- and T2-weighted) across all VOIs. Excluding the 10-mm VOI, reproducibility improved to 16 (T1-weighted) and 55 features (T2-weighted). The stability of all other features also increased in feature maps.

conclusionsTranslating images into parametric maps before feature extraction improves reproducibility across different VOI sizes in normal liver MRI. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The size of the segmented VOI influences the feature quantity of radiomics, while software-based conversion of images into parametric feature maps before feature sampling improves reproducibility across different VOI sizes in MRI of normal liver tissue. KEY POINTS: • Parametric feature maps can compensate for different VOI sizes. • The effect seems dependent on the VOI sizes and the MRI sequence. • Feature maps can visualize features throughout the entire image stack.

Indexed as

AbdomenLiverHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesLiverMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomicsReproducibility of resultsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID37670193
PMCPMC10480134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.