ArticleJournal of neurology2023
Investigating differences in young- and late-onset progressive supranuclear palsy.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy in Navarre, Spain: A Population-Based Study.European journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Ethnic Differences in Atypical Parkinsonism-is South Asian PSP Different?Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of age of onset on the presentation of progressive supranuclear palsy phenotypes is not well studied. We hypothesized that there is difference in presentation and phenotype between young- and late-onset PSP.
objectivesOur aim was to compare phenotypes and rate of change in disability between young-onset PSP (YOPSP) and late-onset PSP (LOPSP).
methodsRetrospective data of patients seen in the Rossy PSP Centre from March 2014 to April 2022 with clinical diagnosis of PSP as per the MDS 2017 diagnostic criteria were examined. We used cut-off age of 65 years to categorize the patients into YOPSP and LOPSP. We compared the prevalence of phenotypes, presenting symptoms, and MDS core criteria between the two groups. The severity of disease between the two groups was measured using PSP-RS.
resultsWe found 107 patients with clinical diagnosis of PSP as per MDS criteria, a third were defined as YOPSP. PSP speech/language (SL) phenotype was more prevalent in YOPSP (18% vs 0%, p < 0.001). Aphasia was significantly higher in YOPSP (16% vs 1.4%, p = 0.03). The speech and language dysfunction (C1) core criteria were more prevalent in YOPSP (33.3% vs 12.2%, p = 0.05). Longitudinal analysis of PSP-RS showed worsening of bulbar total score at 6 months in YOPSP (t (38) = 2.87; p = 0.05).
conclusionOur study revealed that YOPSP are more likely to present with a speech and language variant. Our results highlight that age of onset may predict PSP phenotypes, which holds both clinical and prognostic importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.