ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2023
Can probiotics prevent dental caries?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06063239 (Probiotics in Special Needs Patients at High Risk for Tooth Decay), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Probiotics in Special Needs Patients at High Risk for Tooth Decay: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus: An Overview of the Viability in Fruit and Vegetable Juices and Their Potential Effects on Human Health.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Review
- Probiotic Therapy as an Adjuvant in the Treatment of Periodontal Disease: An Innovative Approach.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Exploring the In Vitro Antibacterial Potential of Specific Probiotic Strains against Oral Pathogens.Microorganisms · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
data sourcesThis study was a systematic review conducted in accordance with the Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was undertaken using eleven databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, The Cochrane Library, Ovid, Scopus, Sinomed, Sciencedirect, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Technology Periodicals Database (VIP). Additional studies were identified by searching the references of these studies. The search time was from inception to April 2022. STUDY SELECTION: The population, intervention, comparison and outcomes were considered. The level of evidence was limited to relevant randomised control trials (RCT) that answered the questions defined in this review. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Screening of eligible studies was conducted by two independent reviewers. Data was extracted using a standardised form which included information about the type of research, population, sample size of experimental group and control group, outcome measurements and results. Bias risk and evidence quality assessment were also assessed. Where appropriate, standard meta-analysis techniques were used to pool study results. The statistical analysis was performed using the RevMan5.4 software and the Stata16. Sensitivity analysis was performed on the combined analysis results.
resultsA total of 17 RCTs were identified to meet the eligibility criteria. The trials lasted between 2 and 24 weeks and were published after 2000. The studies encompassed 3781 preschool children divided into an experimental group (n = 2047) and a control group (n = 1734). The meta-analysis highlighted that incidence of dental caries could be prevented by probiotics. Caries incidence in preschool children was reduced in the Lactobacillus rhamnosus group. Streptococcus Mutans (S.mutans) count in saliva could be reduced however, probiotics could not reduce the number of S.mutans in dental plaque.
conclusionsThe authors conclude that probiotics could prevent dental caries. Lactobacillus rhamnosus was identified as the more effective than other probiotics to reduce dental caries in preschool children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.