ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2024
Copy number variation analysis in 138 families with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome identifies causal homozygous deletions in PLCE1 and NPHS2 in two families.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in SRNS Gene Research: From Precision Classification to Precision Diagnosis and Treatment.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The Importance of Copy Number Variant Analysis in Patients with Monogenic Kidney Disease.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSteroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is the second most common cause of kidney failure in children and adults under the age of 20 years. Previously, we were able to detect by exome sequencing (ES) a known monogenic cause of SRNS in 25-30% of affected families. However, ES falls short of detecting copy number variants (CNV). Therefore, we hypothesized that causal CNVs could be detected in a large SRNS cohort.
methodsWe performed genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based CNV analysis on a cohort of 138 SRNS families, in whom we previously did not identify a genetic cause through ES. We evaluated ES and CNV data for variants in 60 known SRNS genes and in 13 genes in which variants are known to cause a phenocopy of SRNS. We applied previously published, predefined criteria for CNV evaluation.
resultsWe detected a novel CNV in two genes in 2 out of 138 families (1.5%). The 9,673 bp homozygous deletion in PLCE1 and the 6,790 bp homozygous deletion in NPHS2 were confirmed across the breakpoints by PCR and Sanger sequencing.
conclusionsWe confirmed that CNV analysis can identify the genetic cause in SRNS families that remained unsolved after ES. Though the rate of detected CNVs is minor, CNV analysis can be used when there are no other genetic causes identified. Causative CNVs are less common in SRNS than in other monogenic kidney diseases, such as congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract, where the detection rate was 5.3%. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.