ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
M-Shaped Auricular Cartilage Grafts for Correcting Short Nose Deformity in Asians: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe demand for rhinoplasty in Asia is growing annually, and short nose deformity has been one of the main reasons for the surgery due to its high incidence. There is an urgent need for rhinoplasty suitable for Asians because of their different facial features from Westerners. The M-shaped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty has been developed as a new method for correcting short nose deformity for Asians. This study aimed to evaluate the aesthetic and functional results of M-shaped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty compared to clinically commonly used rhinoplasty methods.
methodsA total of 45 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups of 15 patients: The first group underwent M-shaped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty, the second group underwent auricular-septal cartilage rhinoplasty, and the third group underwent overlapped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty. All of these patients underwent comprehensive rhinoplasty and had silicone or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implants in the dorsum of their noses.
resultsThe patient score improvements on the three patient-reported outcome measures were higher in the M-shaped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty group (1.65/1.79/0.11) compared with the overlapped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty group (1.40/1.51/0.05), and the score improvements in the auricular-septal cartilage rhinoplasty group (2.04/1.98/0.28) were the highest.
conclusionsThis is a retrospective clinical study demonstrating the clinical efficacy of M-shaped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty. Compared with the overlapped auricular cartilage rhinoplasty, the effect of this novel M-shaped method is better. However, when compared to the auricular-septal cartilage rhinoplasty with septal extension and reinforcement using nasal septal cartilage, its effect is slightly worse. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
37670052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.