Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37670023›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Asymmetric quantum decision-making.

Honoka Shiratori, Hiroaki Shinkawa, André Röhm, Nicolas Chauvet, Etsuo Segawa, Jonathan Laurent, Guillaume Bachelier, Tomoki Yamagami, Ryoichi Horisaki, Makoto Naruse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Honoka ShiratoriDepartment of Information Physics and Computing, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan. 8308123768hs@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Hiroaki ShinkawaDepartment of Information Physics and Computing, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
André RöhmDepartment of Information Physics and Computing, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Nicolas ChauvetDepartment of Information Physics and Computing, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Etsuo SegawaGraduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, 79-1 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 240-8501, Japan.
Jonathan LaurentCNRS, Institut Néel, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, 38042, France.
Guillaume BachelierCNRS, Institut Néel, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, 38042, France.
Tomoki YamagamiDepartment of Information Physics and Computing, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Ryoichi HorisakiDepartment of Information Physics and Computing, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
Makoto NaruseDepartment of Information Physics and Computing, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FRYokohama National University · JP

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJCR17N2Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP20H00233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective decision-making plays a crucial role in information and communication systems. However, decision conflicts among agents often impede the maximization of potential utilities within the system. Quantum processes have shown promise in achieving conflict-free joint decisions between two agents through the entanglement of photons or the quantum interference of orbital angular momentum (OAM). Nonetheless, previous studies have shown symmetric resultant joint decisions, which, while preserving equality, fail to address disparities. In light of global challenges such as ethics and equity, it is imperative for decision-making systems to not only maintain existing equality but also address and resolve disparities. In this study, we investigate asymmetric collective decision-making theoretically and numerically using quantum interference of photons carrying OAM or entangled photons. We successfully demonstrate the realization of asymmetry; however, it should be noted that a certain degree of photon loss is inevitable in the proposed models. We also provide an analytical formulation for determining the available range of asymmetry and describe a method for obtaining the desired degree of asymmetry.

Identifiers

PMID37670023
PMCPMC10480193
OpenAlexW4386457415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.