ArticleBMJ open2023
Development and validation of a multimodal feature fusion prognostic model for lumbar degenerative disease based on machine learning: a study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mortality Prediction from Patient's First Day PAAC Radiograph in Internal Medicine Intensive Care Unit Using Artificial Intelligence Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prevalence of lumbar disc herniation and its associated factors: A cross-sectional study in Gansu.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLumbar degenerative disease (LDD) is one of the most common reasons for patients to present with low back pain. Proper evaluation and treatment of patients with LDD are important, which clinicians perform using a variety of predictors for guidance in choosing the most appropriate treatment. Because evidence on which treatment is best for LDD is limited, the purpose of this study is to establish a clinical prediction model based on machine learning (ML) to accurately predict outcomes of patients with LDDs in the early stages by their clinical characteristics and imaging changes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this study, we develop and validate a clinical prognostic model to determine whether patients will experience complications within 6 months after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Baseline data will be collected from patients' electronic medical records. As of now, we have recruited a total of 580 participants (n=400 for development, n=180 for validation). The study's primary outcome will be the incidence of complications within 6 months after PELD. We will use an ML algorithm and a multiple logistic regression analysis model to screen factors affecting surgical efficacy. We will evaluate the calibration and differentiation performance of the model by the area under the curve. Sensitivity (Sen), specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be reported in the validation data set, with a target of 80% Sen. The results of this study could better illustrate the performance of the clinical prediction model, ultimately helping both clinicians and patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the medical ethics committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Lanzhou, China; No. 2022-57). Findings and related data will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, at conferences, and through open scientific frameworks. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Register (www.chictr.org.cn) No. ChiCTR2200064421.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.