Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37669799›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2023

Negotiating public-health intellectual property licensing agreements to increase access to health technologies: an insider's story.

Charles Gore, Sébastien Morin, John-Arne Røttingen, Marie Paule Kieny

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Why is roll-out of long-acting PrEP agents so slow?Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charles GoreManagement, Medicines Patent Pool, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-9113
Sébastien MorinPolicy, Strategy and Market Access, Medicines Patent Pool, Geneva, Switzerland smorin@mppf.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-4426-326X
John-Arne RøttingenGovernance Board, Medicines Patent Pool, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5587-4296
Marie Paule KienyGovernance Board, Medicines Patent Pool, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5943-6488

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health voluntary licensing of intellectual property has successfully been applied to increase access to medicines in certain disease areas, producing health benefits and economic savings, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. There is however limited understanding of the intricacies of the approach, the modalities by which it works in practice, its levers and the trade-offs made. Such knowledge may be critical in deciding what role licensing should have in pandemic preparedness and equitable access to health technologies more broadly. This paper examines the case for licensing, the considerations for balancing public health needs, the challenges of negotiations, and the processes for validating proposed agreements. No access mechanism is perfect, but evidence suggests that public-health licensing has an important role to play, although it remains underused. Understanding some of the realities, strengths, limitations and complexities of applying the model may help calibrate expectations and develop incentives to expand its applications.

Indexed as

NegotiatingPublic HealthBiomedical TechnologyHumansIncomePandemicshealth economicshealth policies and all other topicshealth policyinfections, diseases, disorders, injuriespublic health

Identifiers

PMID37669799
PMCPMC10496684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.