Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37669352›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2023

Protecting Personhood: A Classic Grounded Theory.

Amélia Didier, Alvita Nathaniel, Helen Scott, Susanne Look, Lazare Benaroyo, Maya Zumstein-Shaha

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Amélia DidierSchool of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5306-357X
Alvita NathanielDepartment of Nursing, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3977-3732
Helen ScottGrounded Theory Institute, Chichester, UK.
Susanne LookVivantes Hospital Group, Berlin, Germany.
Lazare BenaroyoInterdisciplinary Ethics Center, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Maya Zumstein-ShahaBern University of Applied Sciences Health, Bern, Switzerland.
Bern University of Applied Sciences · CHHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHUniversity of Chichester · GBUniversity of Lausanne · CHVivantes Klinikum · DEWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of perceiving and considering patients as healthcare partners has been increasingly promoted. Healthcare systems around the world are now highly interested in patient engagement, participation, collaboration, and partnership. Healthcare professionals are advised that patients, as autonomous beings, should be active in and responsible for a portion of their own care. The study presented here focused on patients' perceptions of interprofessional collaboration. It was conducted using the classic grounded theory methodology. The theory of protecting personhood emerged as the core concept of hospitalized patients, cared for by interprofessional healthcare teams. This theory encapsulates the process hospitalized patients go through to find balance in their sense of self, oscillating between personhood and patienthood in the unfamiliar hospital environment. The process consists of four stages: the stage of introspection, during which hospitalized patients become aware of their self as a person and as a patient; the stage of preservation, when patients find a balance between the sense of personhood and patienthood; the stage of rupture, wherein patients experience an imbalance between their sense of personhood and patienthood; and the stage of reconciliation, in which personhood is restored. The theory of protecting personhood offers insights into a better understanding of hospitalized patients' experiences and strategies, revealing the importance of relationships, and the driving force of empowerment. This study is about patients' perspectives of interprofessional healthcare teams. A grounded theory process allowed the emergence of patients' concerns and expectations, leading to a substantive theory grounded in the patients' data.

Indexed as

HospitalsPersonhoodGrounded TheoryHealth PersonnelHumansPatient Care Teambehaviorcommunicationdoctor–patientexperienceshealthhealthcareholistic careillness and diseaselived experiencemethodologynurse–patienttheory developmenttrustusers’ experiences

Identifiers

PMID37669352
PMCPMC10626982
OpenAlexW4386453105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.