ArticlePloS one2023
Deep learning-based pectoralis muscle volume segmentation method from chest computed tomography image using sagittal range detection and axial slice-based segmentation.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Value of Chest CT-Derived Pectoralis Muscle Metrics for In-Hospital Mortality and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in AECOPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Early warning and stratification of the elderly cardiopulmonary dysfunction-related diseases: multicentre prospective study protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based respiratory muscle segmentation as a potential imaging biomarker for respiratory function assessment.PloS one · 2024Article
- A novel mean shape based post-processing method for enhancing deep learning lower-limb muscle segmentation accuracy.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pectoralis muscle is an important indicator of respiratory muscle function and has been linked to various parenchymal biomarkers, such as airflow limitation severity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, which are widely used in diagnosing parenchymal diseases, including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pectoralis muscle segmentation is a method for measuring muscle volume and mass for various applications. The segmentation method is based on deep-learning techniques that combine a muscle area detection model and a segmentation model. The training dataset for the detection model comprised multichannel images of patients, whereas the segmentation model was trained on 7,796 cases of the computed tomography (CT) image dataset of 1,841 patients. The dataset was expanded incrementally through an active learning process. The performance of the model was evaluated by comparing the segmentation results with manual annotations by radiologists and the volumetric differences between the CT image datasets of the same patients. The results indicated that the machine learning model is promising in segmenting the pectoralis major muscle, with good agreement between the automatic segmentation and manual annotations by radiologists. The training accuracy and loss values of the validation set were 0.9954 and 0.0725, respectively, and for segmentation, the loss value was 0.0579. This study shows the potential clinical usefulness of the machine learning model for pectoralis major muscle segmentation as a quantitative biomarker for various parenchymal and muscular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.