Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37669291›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

A drug repurposing screen for whipworms informed by comparative genomics.

Avril Coghlan, Frederick A Partridge, María Adelaida Duque-Correa, Gabriel Rinaldi, Simon Clare, Lisa Seymour, Cordelia Brandt, Tapoka T Mkandawire, Catherine McCarthy, Nancy Holroyd and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Avril CoghlanWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2775-5951
Frederick A PartridgeUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
María Adelaida Duque-CorreaWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Gabriel RinaldiWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Simon ClareWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lisa SeymourWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cordelia BrandtWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Tapoka T MkandawireWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Catherine McCarthyWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nancy HolroydWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Marina NickUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anwen E BrownUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sirapat TonitiwongUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
David B SattelleUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew BerrimanWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9581-0377
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N024842/1Wellcome Trust 206194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hundreds of millions of people worldwide are infected with the whipworm Trichuris trichiura. Novel treatments are urgently needed as current drugs, such as albendazole, have relatively low efficacy. We have investigated whether drugs approved for other human diseases could be repurposed as novel anti-whipworm drugs. In a previous comparative genomics analysis, we identified 409 drugs approved for human use that we predicted to target parasitic worm proteins. Here we tested these ex vivo by assessing motility of adult worms of Trichuris muris, the murine whipworm, an established model for human whipworm research. We identified 14 compounds with EC50 values of ≤50 μM against T. muris ex vivo, and selected nine for testing in vivo. However, the best worm burden reduction seen in mice was just 19%. The high number of ex vivo hits against T. muris shows that we were successful at predicting parasite proteins that could be targeted by approved drugs. In contrast, the low efficacy of these compounds in mice suggest challenges due to their chemical properties (e.g. lipophilicity, polarity, molecular weight) and pharmacokinetics (e.g. absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) that may (i) promote absorption by the host gastrointestinal tract, thereby reducing availability to the worms embedded in the large intestine, and/or (ii) restrict drug uptake by the worms. This indicates that identifying structural analogues that have reduced absorption by the host, and increased uptake by worms, may be necessary for successful drug development against whipworms.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningTrichurisAdultAlbendazoleAnimalsBiological TransportGenomicsHumansMiceAlbendazole

Identifiers

PMID37669291
PMCPMC10503962
OpenAlexW4386453498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.