Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37669252›Full record

ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023

The Impact of Mechanical Energy Assessment on Mechanical Ventilation: A Comprehensive Review and Practical Application.

Filip Burša, David Oczka, Ondřej Jor, Peter Sklienka, Michal Frelich, Jan Stigler, Vojtech Vodička, Tereza Ekrtová, Marek Penhaker, Jan Máca

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Filip BuršaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9770-1433
David OczkaDepartment of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7626-3673
Ondřej JorDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Peter SklienkaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Michal FrelichDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Jan StiglerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Vojtech VodičkaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Tereza EkrtováDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Marek PenhakerDepartment of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9527-4642
Jan MácaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
University Hospital Ostrava · CZVSB - Technical University of Ostrava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation (MV) provides basic organ support for patients who have acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, with acute respiratory distress syndrome as the most severe form. The use of excessive ventilation forces can exacerbate the lung condition and lead to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI); mechanical energy (ME) or power can characterize such forces applied during MV. The ME metric combines all MV parameters affecting the respiratory system (ie, lungs, chest, and airways) into a single value. Besides evaluating the overall ME, this parameter can be also related to patient-specific characteristics, such as lung compliance or patient weight, which can further improve the value of ME for characterizing the aggressiveness of lung ventilation. High ME is associated with poor outcomes and could be used as a prognostic parameter and indicator of the risk of VILI. ME is rarely determined in everyday practice because the calculations are complicated and based on multiple equations. Although low ME does not conclusively prevent the possibility of VILI (eg, due to the lung inhomogeneity and preexisting damage), individualization of MV settings considering ME appears to improve outcomes. This article aims to review the roles of bedside assessment of mechanical power, its relevance in mechanical ventilation, and its associations with treatment outcomes. In addition, we discuss methods for ME determination, aiming to propose the most suitable method for bedside application of the ME concept in everyday practice.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeVentilator-Induced Lung InjuryAggressionHumansRespirationRespiration, ArtificialThorax

Identifiers

PMID37669252
PMCPMC10492505
OpenAlexW4385629469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.