ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2023
Critical Assessment of Condensate Boundaries in Dual-Color Single Particle Tracking.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ER tethering and active transport govern condensate diffusion during hyperosmotic stress.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Nanoscale domains govern local diffusion and ageing within fused-in-sarcoma condensates.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomolecular condensates are membraneless cellular compartments generated by phase separation that regulate a broad variety of cellular functions by enriching some biomolecules while excluding others. Live-cell single particle tracking of individual fluorophore-labeled condensate components has provided insights into a condensate's mesoscopic organization and biological functions, such as revealing the recruitment, translation, and decay of RNAs within ribonucleoprotein (RNP) granules. Specifically, during dual-color tracking, one imaging channel provides a time series of individual biomolecule locations, while the other channel monitors the location of the condensate relative to these molecules. Therefore, an accurate assessment of a condensate's boundary is critical for combined live-cell single particle-condensate tracking. Despite its importance, a quantitative benchmarking and objective comparison of the various available boundary detection methods is missing due to the lack of an absolute ground truth for condensate images. Here, we use synthetic data of defined ground truth to generate noise-overlaid images of condensates with realistic phase separation parameters to benchmark the most commonly used methods for condensate boundary detection, including an emerging machine-learning method. We find that it is critical to carefully choose an optimal boundary detection method for a given dataset to obtain accurate measurements of single particle-condensate interactions. The criteria proposed in this study to guide the selection of an optimal boundary detection method can be broadly applied to imaging-based studies of condensates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.