Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37669215›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2024

Bayesian joint models for multi-regional clinical trials.

Nathan W Bean, Joseph G Ibrahim, Matthew A Psioda

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathan W BeanDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9946-0119
Joseph G IbrahimDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Matthew A PsiodaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4450-6981
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018NIEHS NIH HHS T32ES007018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) have increased in popularity in the pharmaceutical industry due to their ability to accelerate the global drug development process. To address potential challenges with MRCTs, the International Council for Harmonisation released the E17 guidance document which suggests the use of statistical methods that utilize information borrowing across regions if regional sample sizes are small. We develop an approach that allows for information borrowing via Bayesian model averaging in the context of a joint analysis of survival and longitudinal data from MRCTs. In this novel application of joint models to MRCTs, we use Laplace's method to integrate over subject-specific random effects and to approximate posterior distributions for region-specific treatment effects on the time-to-event outcome. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that the joint modeling approach can result in an increased rejection rate when testing the global treatment effect compared with methods that analyze survival data alone. We then apply the proposed approach to data from a cardiovascular outcomes MRCT.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, StatisticalBiostatisticsClinical Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicSurvival AnalysisBayesian clinical trialsBayesian model averagingJoint modelsLaplace approximationLEADER trialMulti-regional clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID37669215
PMCPMC11247186
OpenAlexW4386437699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.