Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37669158›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023

Image-encoded biological and non-biological variables may be used as shortcuts in deep learning models trained on multisite neuroimaging data.

Raissa Souza, Matthias Wilms, Milton Camacho, G Bruce Pike, Richard Camicioli, Oury Monchi, Nils D Forkert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards objective and systematic evaluation of bias in artificial intelligence for medical imaging.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raissa SouzaDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7455-3383
Matthias WilmsHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.
Milton CamachoDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.
G Bruce PikeDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.
Richard CamicioliDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada.
Oury MonchiHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.
Nils D ForkertDepartment of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2556-3224

Funding

Canada Research ChairsCanada Research Chairs programCanadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in AgingCanadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA)Canadian Institutes for Health ResearchCanadian Open Neuroscience PlatformCanadian Open Neuroscience Platform (CONP)Discovery GrantHotchkiss Brain InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)Parkinson Association of AlbertaRiver Fund at Calgary FoundationTourmaline Chair in Parkinson disease
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis work investigates if deep learning (DL) models can classify originating site locations directly from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans with and without correction for intensity differences. MATERIAL AND

methodsA large database of 1880 T1-weighted MRI scans collected across 41 sites originally for Parkinson's disease (PD) classification was used to classify sites in this study. Forty-six percent of the datasets are from PD patients, while 54% are from healthy participants. After preprocessing the T1-weighted scans, 2 additional data types were generated: intensity-harmonized T1-weighted scans and log-Jacobian deformation maps resulting from nonlinear atlas registration. Corresponding DL models were trained to classify sites for each data type. Additionally, logistic regression models were used to investigate the contribution of biological (age, sex, disease status) and non-biological (scanner type) variables to the models' decision.

resultsA comparison of the 3 different types of data revealed that DL models trained using T1-weighted and intensity-harmonized T1-weighted scans can classify sites with an accuracy of 85%, while the model using log-Jacobian deformation maps achieved a site classification accuracy of 54%. Disease status and scanner type were found to be significant confounders. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate that MRI scans encode relevant site-specific information that models could use as shortcuts that cannot be removed using simple intensity harmonization methods.

conclusionThe ability of DL models to exploit site-specific biases as shortcuts raises concerns about their reliability, generalization, and deployability in clinical settings.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingReproducibility of Resultsdata harmonizationdeep learningMRImultisite classificationshortcut learning

Identifiers

PMID37669158
PMCPMC10654841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.