ArticleAnnals of surgery2024
How Does Omitting Additional Surgery After Local Excision Affect the Prognostic Outcome of Patients With High-risk T1 Colorectal Cancer?
Article in Annals of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07669298 (Active Surveillance vs Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Resected Intermediate-Risk T1 Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Active Surveillance vs Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Resected Intermediate-Risk T1 Rectal Cancer: Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic resection versus surgery for T1 rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic and safety outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- The Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Guideline
- Does Local Excision Without Salvage Surgery Affect the Prognostic Outcome of Patients With Malignant Colorectal Polyp? A Long-Term Survival Analysis.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Competing Mortality Redefines the Net Benefit of Additional Surgery After Endoscopic Resection for T1 Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Long-term outcomes of pT1 rectal cancer after transanal endoscopic surgery: again, a word of caution on high local recurrence - a cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Observational
- Article
- Does Omitting Additional Surgery After Local Resection Affect Oncological Outcomes in Patients with High-Risk pT1 Colorectal Cancer?Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction for T1 Colorectal Cancer: Promise and Challenges.Gut and liver · 2025Article
- T1 colorectal cancer patients' perspective on information provision and therapeutic decision-making after local resection.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
- Comment on "How Does Omitting Additional Surgery After Local Excision Affect the Prognostic Outcome of Patients With High-Risk T1 Colorectal Cancer?"Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- [Prognosis Analysis of Additional Surgical Treatment for High-Risk T1 Colorectal Cancer Patients After Endoscopic Resection].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
34 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate how omitting additional surgery after local excision (LE) affects patient outcomes in high-risk T1 colorectal cancer (CRC).
backgroundIt is debatable whether additional surgery should be performed for all patients with high-risk T1 CRC regardless of the tolerability of invasive procedures.
methodsPatients who had received LE for T1 CRC at the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum institutions between 2009 and 2016 were analyzed. Those who had received additional surgical resection and those who did not were matched one-on-one by the propensity score-matching method. A total of 401 propensity score-matched pairs were extracted from 1975 patients at 27 Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum institutions and were compared.
resultsRegional lymph node metastasis was observed in 31 (7.7%) patients in the LE + surgery group. Comparatively, the incidence of oncologic adverse events was low in the LE-alone group, such as the 5-year cumulative risk of local recurrence (4.1%) or overall recurrence (5.5%). In addition, the difference in the 5-year cancer-specific survival between the LE + surgery and LE-alone groups was only 1.8% (99.7% and 97.9%, respectively), whereas the 5-year overall survival was significantly lower in the LE-alone group than in the LE + surgery group [88.5% vs 94.5%, respectively ( P = 0.002)].
conclusionsThose who had decided to omit additional surgery at the dedicated center for CRC treatment presented a small number of oncologic events and a satisfactory cancer-specific survival, which may suggest an important role of risk assessment regarding nononcologic adverse events to achieve a best practice for each individual with high-risk T1 tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.