Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37668931›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2023

Current status of the educational environment to acquire and maintain the professional skills of radiotherapy technology and medical physics specialists in Japan: a nationwide survey.

Naoki Hayashi, Masahiko Okumura, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Yoshitomo Ishihara, Seiichi Ota, Naoki Tohyama, Kohei Shimomura, Hiroyuki Okamoto, Hiroshi Onishi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Naoki HayashiDivision of Medical Physics, School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan. hayashi@fujita-hu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-3651
Masahiko OkumuraDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Morinomiya University of Medical Science, Osaka, Japan.
Mitsuhiro NakamuraDepartment of Advanced Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshitomo IshiharaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan.
Seiichi OtaDepartment of Medical Technology, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoki TohyamaDivision of Medical Physics, Tokyo Bay Makuhari Clinic for Advanced Imaging, Cancer Screening, and High-Precision Radiotherapy, Chiba, Japan.
Kohei ShimomuraDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medical Science , Kyoto College of Medical Science, Nantan, Japan.
Hiroyuki OkamotoRadiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi OnishiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Japan.
Fujita Health University · JPJapanese Red Cross Society Wakayama Medical Center · JPKyoto College of Medical Science · JPKyoto University · JPMorinomiya University of Medical Sciences · JPTokyo National Hospital · JPUniversity Hospital Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPUniversity of Yamanashi · JP

Funding

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 21EA1010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the educational environment of radiotherapy technology and medical physics specialists (RTMP) in Japan. We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey in radiotherapy institutions between June and August 2022. Participants were asked questions regarding the educational system, perspectives on updating RTMP's skills and qualifications, and perspectives on higher education for RTMP at radiotherapy institutions. The results were then analyzed in detail according to three factors: whether the hospital was designed for cancer care, whether it was a Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO)-accredited hospital, and whether it was an intensity-modulated radiation therapy charged hospital. Responses were obtained from 579 (69%) nationwide radiation therapy institutions. For non-qualified RTMP, 10% of the institutions had their own educational systems, only 17% of institutions provided on-the-job training, and 84% of institutions encouraged participation in educational lectures and workshops in academic societies. However, for qualified RTMP, 3.0% of institutions had their own educational systems, only 8.9% of the institutions provided on-the-job training, and 83% encouraged participation in academic conferences and workshops. Less than 1% of the facilities offered salary increases for certification, whereas 8.2% offered consideration for occupational promotion. Regarding the educational environment, JASTRO-accredited hospitals were better than general hospitals. Few institutions have their own educational systems for qualified and non-qualified RTMP, but they encourage them to attend educational seminars and conferences. It is desirable to provide systematic education and training by academic and professional organizations to maintain the skills of individuals.

Indexed as

Radiation OncologyHumansJapanPhysicsSurveys and QuestionnairesTechnologyContinuous professional developmentEducationMedical physicistQuestionnaire surveyRadiotherapyRadiotherapy technologist

Identifiers

PMID37668931
OpenAlexW4386437774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.