Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37668920›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Mutation Knock-in Methods Using Single-Stranded DNA and Gene Editing Tools in Zebrafish.

Sergey V Prykhozhij, Jason N Berman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advancing Knock-In Approaches for Robust Genome Editing in Zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Zebrafish: A Versatile and Powerful Model for Biomedical Research.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sergey V PrykhozhijChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jason N BermanChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. jberman@cheo.on.ca.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction or knock-in of precise genomic modifications remains one of the most important applications of CRISPR/Cas9 in all model systems including zebrafish. The most widely used type of donor template containing the desired modification is single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), either in the form of single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (ssODN) (<150 nucleotides (nt)) or as long ssDNA (lssDNA) molecules (up to about 2000 nt). Despite the challenges posed by DNA repair after DNA double-strand breaks, knock-in of precise mutations is relatively straightforward in zebrafish. Knock-in efficiency can be enhanced by careful donor template design, using lssDNA as template or tethering the donor template DNA to the Cas9-guide RNA complex. Other point mutation methods such as base editing and prime editing are starting to be applied in zebrafish and many other model systems. However, these methods may not always be sufficiently accessible or may have limited capacity to perform all desired mutation knock-ins which are possible with ssDNA-based knock-in methods. Thus, it is likely that there will be complementarity in the technologies used for generating precise mutants. Here, we review and describe a suite of CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in procedures utilizing ssDNA as the donor template in zebrafish, point out the potential challenges and suggest possible approaches for their solution ultimately leading to successful generation of precise mutant lines.

Indexed as

DNA, Single-StrandedZebrafishAnimalsGene EditingMutationNucleotidesPoint MutationDNA, Single-StrandedNucleotidesCRISPR/Cas9Disease modelKnock-inLong ssDNAPoint mutationssODNZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID37668920
OpenAlexW4386437954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.