ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2023
Predictive nomogram for in-hospital mortality among older patients with intra-abdominal sepsis incorporating skeletal muscle mass.
Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of sarcopenia and frailty on outcomes of patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Sepsis accelerates frailty and functional decline in older adults: a 12-month prospective study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Associations between sarcopenia (defined by low muscle mass), inflammatory markers, and all-cause mortality in older adults: mediation analyses in a large U.S. NHANES community sample, 1999-2006.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Epigenome-wide DNA methylation profiling in septic and non-septic patients with similar infections: potential use as sepsis biomarkers.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies on prognostic factors for older patients with intra-abdominal sepsis are scarce, and the association between skeletal muscle mass and prognosis among such patients remains unclear.
aimsTo develop a nomogram to predict in-hospital mortality among older patients with intra-abdominal sepsis.
methodsOlder patients with intra-abdominal sepsis were prospectively recruited. Their demographics, clinical features, laboratory results, abdominal computed tomography-derived muscle mass, and in-hospital mortality were recorded. The predictors of mortality were selected via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable logistic regression analyses, and a nomogram was developed. The nomogram was assessed and compared with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II.
resultsIn total, 464 patients were included, of whom 104 (22.4%) died. Six independent risk factors (skeletal muscle index, cognitive impairment, frailty, heart rate, red blood cell distribution width, and blood urea nitrogen) were incorporated into the nomogram. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and calibration plot revealed a good consistency between the predicted and observed probabilities. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.875 (95% confidence interval = 0.838-0.912), which was significantly higher than those of commonly used scoring systems. The decision curve analysis indicated the nomogram had good predictive performance. DISCUSSION: Our nomogram, which is predictive of in-hospital mortality among older patients with intra-abdominal sepsis, incorporates muscle mass, a factor that warrants consideration by clinicians. The model has a high prognostic ability and might be applied in clinical practice after external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.