ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024
Comparative clinical study of the modified Broström procedure for the treatment of the anterior talofibular ligament injury-outcomes of the open technique compared to the arthroscopic procedure.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arthroscopic vs. open Broström-Gould procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Outcomes of Open Versus Arthroscopic Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Comparison of the medial midline and the anterolateral portal in ankle arthroscopy for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the medial talus.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo observe the clinical efficacy and safety of arthroscopic-modified Broström surgery for the treatment of anterior talofibular ligament injury.
methodsThe clinical data of 51 cases with anterior talofibular ligament injury were retrospectively analyzed, in which 23 patients were treated by arthroscopic-modified Broström surgery (arthroscopic surgery group) and 28 patients were treated by open-modified Broström surgery (open surgery group). The time to surgery, hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) scores of ankle pain, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot scores, and incidence rate of complications were compared between the two groups.
results(1) General results: compared with open surgery group, arthroscopic surgery group had shorter time to surgery and hospital stay ((33.8 ± 6.7) min, (42.1 ± 8.5) min, t = 1.468, P = 0.001; (2.2 ± 1.4) d, (5.8 ± 1.6) d, t = 1.975, P = 1.975, P = 0.002). (2) VAS scores of ankle pain: there was an interaction effect between the time and group factors (F = 0.378, P = 0.018); overall, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS scores of ankle pain between the two groups, i.e., there was no grouping effect (F = 1.865, P = 0.163); there was statistically significant difference in VAS score of ankle pain at different time points before and after operation, i.e., there was a time effect (F = 1.675, P = 0.000); the VAS scores of ankle pain showed a decreasing trend with time in both groups, but the decreasing trend was not completely consistent between the two groups ((7.78 ± 1.23), (1.23 ± 1.24), (1.03 ± 0.35), (1.01 ± 0.28), F = 0.568, P = 0.000. (7.45 ± 1.43), (1.45 ± 1.87), (1.23 ± 0.55), (1.04 ± 0.37), F = 1.358, P = 0.000); there was no statistically significant difference in VAS score of ankle joint pain between the two groups six and 12 months before and after surgery (t = 2.987, P = 0.055; t = 1.654, P = 2.542; t = 0.015, P = 0.078); the VAS scores of ankle pain in the arthroscopic surgery group was lower than that in the open surgery group three months after operation (t = 1.267, P = 0.023). (3) AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores: there was an interaction effect between time and grouping factors (F = 2.693, P = 0.027); overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores between the two groups, i.e., there was no grouping effect (F = 1.983, P = 0.106); there was statistically significant difference in the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores at different time points before and after surgery, i.e., there was a time effect (F = 34.623, P = 0.000); the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores of the two groups showed an increasing trend with time, but the increasing trend of the two groups was not completely consistent ((48.19 ± 12.89), (89.20 ± 8.96), (90.24 ± 7.89), (91.34 ± 9.67), F = 25.623, P = 0.000; (49.35 ± 13.28), (86.78 ± 12.34), (88.78 ± 9.78),(91.43 ± 7.98), F = 33.275, P = 0.000); there was no statistically significant difference in the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores between the two groups 12 months before/after surgery (t = 2.145,P = 0.056;t = 2.879,P = 0.389); compared with open surgery group, the arthroscopic surgery group had higher AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores 3/6 months after surgery (t = 1.346, P = 0.014; t = 1.874, P = 0.028).
conclusionFor the treatment of anterior talofibular ligament injury, arthroscopic surgery group is superior to open surgery group in ankle pain relief and functional recovery and has shorter operation time and hospital stay compared with open surgery group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.