Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37668717›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system: initial experience of a tertiary center with a high background in extraperitoneal laparoscopy surgery.

Miguel Marques-Monteiro, Bernardo Teixeira, Gonçalo Mendes, Alexandra Rocha, Mariana Madanelo, Sofia Mesquita, João Vital, Nuno Vinagre, Martinha Magalhães, Beatriz Oliveira and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hugo™ RAS versus da VinciBMC surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Medtronic's HugoJournal of robotic surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Systematic Review and Clinical Outcomes of new Robotic Systems in Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miguel Marques-MonteiroUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal. mmonteiro.iam@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8222-0511
Bernardo TeixeiraUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Gonçalo MendesUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Alexandra RochaUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Mariana MadaneloUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Sofia MesquitaUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
João VitalUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Nuno VinagreUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Martinha MagalhãesUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Beatriz OliveiraUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Diogo CarneiroUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
José SoaresUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
João CabralUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Frederico TevesUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Avelino FragaUrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Hospital de Santo António · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Hugo™ RAS system is a novel robotic platform with innovative features. However, there are currently no available data on extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed using this system. The objective of this study is to describe the surgical setup and assess the safety and feasibility of the extraperitoneal approach in robotic radical prostatectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system.

methodsSixteen consecutive patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer underwent extraperitoneal RARP ± lymph node dissection at our institution, between March and May 2023. All RARP procedures were performed extraperitoneal with a modular four-arm configuration. The focus was to describe the operative room setup, trocar placement, tilt and docking angles and evaluate the safety and feasibility of this approach with this robotic platform. Secondary outcomes recorded included, total operative time, console time, estimated bleeding, intra- and postoperative complications, and length of stay after surgery. A descriptive analysis was conducted.

resultsWe report on the first sixteen cases of extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed with the new Hugo™ RAS system. All procedures were completed, without the need for conversion or placement of additional ports. No intraoperative complications or major technical failures that would prevent the completion of surgery were recorded. The median operative time was 211 min (IQR 180-277), and the median console time was 152 min (IQR 119-196). The mean docking time was 4.6 min (IQR 4.1-5.2). The median estimated blood loss and the median time to remove the vesical catheter were 200 mL (IQR 150-400) and 8 days (IQR 7-8), respectively. The median length of stay was 2 days (IQR 2-2). Only one minor complication was registered in the first 30 days.

conclusionThis study provides evidence of the safety and feasibility of the extraperitoneal approach in RARP with the Hugo™ RAS system. The description of the surgical setup in terms of trocar placement, arm-cart disposition, tilt and docking angles offers valuable information for surgeons interested in adopting this surgical approach with the Hugo™ RAS platform.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyProstatic NeoplasmsRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleProstateProstatectomyExtraperitonealHugo™ RAS systemMinimally invasive surgeryProstate cancerRobot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID37668717
OpenAlexW4386439098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.